-----Original Message-----
I build my own computers and for others as well and I
have access to OEM versions because I am a system builder
(registered business), even though it is not my main
source of income.My computer that the O.S. (OEM) was
first installed on has been upgraded so extensively, it
barely resembles the original computer. The hard drive is
one of the few items remaining that is original.
Upgrading on this machine is a regular occurrence, mainly
video cards, cpu's and occasionally mainboard.Does this
mean that everytime I do an upgrade on this machine, I
would have to buy a new OEM??
I know very few people who have gone out and paid $A450
for a boxed version of XP home when they can get it for
$A150 OEM, the only difference being the "box" and the
license agreement, which I doubt too many people would
take much notice of.
It's all well and good sprouting on about interlectual
property and license agreements etc, etc. but the fact
remains that Microsoft has had a long and shabby record
on the lack of reliability of their products. The huge
costs caused by their failure to deliver a reliable
product really shows why people have had a gutfull of
their products, especially Windows and one can not blame
them for violating the agreements. After all, Microsoft
are really not abiding by their obligations, that is,
providing a reliable product that consummers ARE PAYING
FOR. I have been told that if Microsoft wants people to
be serious about license agreements, then they ought to
get serious about the products they produce and the
losses they cause people thru' their substandard products.
Fortunately the problems that Windows has caused me over
the years have not caused me much financial loss, only
extreme frustration and it has come to the point now that
I am in the process of changing to the far superior and
cheap alternative LINUX. Hopefully, more and more people
will do the same, thereby sending a wakeup call to
Microsoft.
Rick
willing right
.