linux or bust

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mr Jessop
  • Start date Start date
M

Mr Jessop

just picked up pc format with suse 9.1 included and some basic instructions
on installation. Any advice or links i should read before commencing? I am
of course backing up my data.

I also bought one of those cables that are aerodynamic instead of those flat
ribbon cables. I also mounted my two drives in 5 1/4 caddys. They're those
quick release ones.
 
just picked up pc format with suse 9.1 included and some basic instructions
on installation. Any advice or links i should read before commencing? I am
of course backing up my data.
[/QUOTE]
Are you planning to dualboot or completely replace Windows? If you're
planning to dualboot, free up some hard drive space first rather than
using the installation routine to do it. Makes life easier for
partitioning as unless you know your way around the advanced options in
the installer it'll resize the Windows partition to what it wants.
 
Mr said:
just picked up pc format with suse 9.1 included and some basic
instructions
on installation. Any advice or links i should read before commencing? I
am of course backing up my data.

Yeah... Remember, it isn't Windows, so don't expect it to act, look, or feel
like Windows. Remember, it took you a long time through a slow process to
learn Windows as good as you do now, so expect the same from Linux.

Starting to use Linux for the first time, you'll probably want to use KDE
instead of Gnome, and SuSE is far more KDE-centric anyway.

You'll love SuSE Linux. I used it for a long time, and still have my 9.1
disks. I've since started using Mandrake, because the machine I'm on runs
better with Mandrake, but I've always preferred SuSE.
I also bought one of those cables that are aerodynamic instead of those
flat
ribbon cables. I also mounted my two drives in 5 1/4 caddys. They're
those quick release ones.

Flat ribbon cables are actually more aerodynamic, as you can fold them over
against the side of the case and get them cleanly out of the way of the
air. The round cables are stiff, and too big in diameter to do the same,
and hence, are actually less aerodynamic. But hey...they do look cooler...
 
Ruel Smith said:
Yeah... Remember, it isn't Windows, so don't expect it to act, look, or
feel
like Windows. Remember, it took you a long time through a slow process to
learn Windows as good as you do now, so expect the same from Linux.

pc format seemed to think it handled quite well. YOu don't even need
command line level knowledge anymore. I got that far with msdos 3.2 on an
old amstrad with a 360kb floppy disk drive. And they were floppy back then
too. In fact i remember the single sided 170kb variety of the apple II.

Its been along time since i could type out a whole line of code.


Starting to use Linux for the first time, you'll probably want to use KDE
instead of Gnome, and SuSE is far more KDE-centric anyway.

KDE? Gnome? links please
You'll love SuSE Linux. I used it for a long time, and still have my 9.1
disks. I've since started using Mandrake, because the machine I'm on runs
better with Mandrake, but I've always preferred SuSE.


Flat ribbon cables are actually more aerodynamic, as you can fold them
over
against the side of the case and get them cleanly out of the way of the
air. The round cables are stiff, and too big in diameter to do the same,
and hence, are actually less aerodynamic. But hey...they do look cooler...

i wasn't keen on folding the flat ones. Didn't want to pinch off any
wiring. I also found the flat stuff a bastard to manipulate damn stuff was
almost alive. As i only had one 3.5 bay and the 5.1/4 bays so far away from
the 3.5 i bought 2 quick release caddys that happen to be 5 1/4 ones. So
they are now one above the other with the master at the top and jumpers set
to cable select.

The new wire cable i bought is DEFINITELY 133 wire so that solved a
problem i mentioned in a previous thread. The drives are still cable select
but i can now pull the drives out and swap them in thirty seconds.

My 40gb is the master still. It is partitioned into 2 20gb disks. C drive
was 98. D was xp. I have deleted 98 from windows. There is still a 1gb in
use even though explorer says its now empty. The dual boot function still
works so i suspect hidden msdos stuff. It is actually visible with nero
burn file browser.

The plan with linux is to have a dual boot with linux on c and xp on d with
my data on drive f and g (120gb maxtor partitioned in equal sizes).

i can then bugger about with xp and tweak away whilst still having a working
machine albeit linux. Linux is supposed to be less taxing on a system so i
expect more speedy efficient computing without a physical hardware upgrade.
I'm also hoping for more stability and fewer viruses and of course shit
loads of free legit software.

This may be a pipe dream but i cannot ignore that anti microsoft brigade any
longer.
 
Conor said:
just picked up pc format with suse 9.1 included and some basic
instructions
on installation. Any advice or links i should read before commencing? I
am
of course backing up my data.
Are you planning to dualboot or completely replace Windows? If you're
planning to dualboot, free up some hard drive space first rather than
using the installation routine to do it. Makes life easier for
partitioning as unless you know your way around the advanced options in
the installer it'll resize the Windows partition to what it wants.
[/QUOTE]

Nearly finished backin up data drives (f and g) seperate slave drive.

winxp on d partition of 40gb master.
win98 on C.
now deleted. STill 1gb of used space according to pie graph. I am supposed
to be able to view hidden files. automatic dual boot set up in dos using
the winxp. That was a minimum installation with office, nero, and internet
as a fail safe. I wish to replace 98 with linux. Can i run a virtual
windows on linux or something or have loads of xp partitions with only 1
major application on each? They seem to interfere with each other.
 
Can i run a virtual
windows on linux or something or have loads of xp partitions with only 1
major application on each? They seem to interfere with each other.
[/QUOTE]
What are you trying to acheive? Thats question is about as clear as mud.
 
Conor said:
Can i run a virtual
windows on linux or something or have loads of xp partitions with only 1
major application on each? They seem to interfere with each other.
What are you trying to acheive? Thats question is about as clear as mud.[/QUOTE]

Running a more stable system by running windows applications on a virtual xp
os but actually be running linux. I know you can run virtual os on top of
NT. I have also read about software that allows multiple OS installs so you
can have one application per OS. This stops them overwriting the same dlls
over and over and reducing overall system performance as well as stability.

"I was merely enquiring if it was possible to run a virtual windows machine
on top of linux." so that should application or os become unstable i don't
have to do a complete restart.
 
Mr Jessop:
Running a more stable system by running windows applications on a
virtual xp os but actually be running linux. I know you can run
virtual os on top of NT. I have also read about software that allows
multiple OS installs so you can have one application per OS. This
stops them overwriting the same dlls over and over and reducing
overall system performance as well as stability.

"I was merely enquiring if it was possible to run a virtual windows
machine on top of linux." so that should application or os become
unstable i don't have to do a complete restart.

XP is stable. If you have an application that is crashing and bringing the
whole OS down with it then I don't see how you will solve the problem by
introducing yet another OS. If you have an XP install that is unstable,
then we need to troubleshoot the unstable system.

Have you tried running the errant application in WINE?
 
Mac Cool said:
Mr Jessop:


XP is stable. If you have an application that is crashing and bringing the
whole OS down with it then I don't see how you will solve the problem by
introducing yet another OS. If you have an XP install that is unstable,
then we need to troubleshoot the unstable system.

Have you tried running the errant application in WINE?

no. pinnacle did some odd things to my system. i want to run nero burn and
pinnacle dvd burner. Best if i had a seperate os install for each one.
 
Yes, you can purchase and run VMWare, which then you could install and run
WinXP as a virtual machine.

http://www.vmware.com/products/desktop/ws_features.html

Or, with a product like VMWare, or running a Windows app in Wine or
something similar, you could just close out the crashed window and go on.

Now, I'm not saying that Linux can't be crashed, because my current hardware
problem has frozen my system more than a few times. However, once Linux is
properly running, you'll be up for months, or possibly even years without
ever crashing. However, everything must be supported and configured
properly for it to work properly.

XP, is fairly stable too, but not quite to the degree Linux is. You still
get an occasional BSOD, and drivers can make the OS unstable. However, that
takes you back to my statement about Linux being configured properly. Same
goes for XP. BUT, Linux still is more reliable, IMHO.
no. pinnacle did some odd things to my system. i want to run nero burn
and
pinnacle dvd burner. Best if i had a seperate os install for each one.

I'm not sure about the Pinnacle software, though for video editing ther is
MainActor and KDEnlive. For CD/DVD burning, you can use K3b, which is a
virtual copy of Nero Burning ROM.
 
Ruel Smith:
XP, is fairly stable too, but not quite to the degree Linux is. You
still get an occasional BSOD

Three years with XP Home and no BSODs, no crashes I can remember that
brought down the OS. I think the key to having stable XP system is
compatible components and not installing a lot of junk software.
 
Mac said:
Ruel Smith:


Three years with XP Home and no BSODs, no crashes I can remember that
brought down the OS. I think the key to having stable XP system is
compatible components and not installing a lot of junk software.

I agree, and I did qualify my statements, claiming that, like Linux, a
properly setup XP system was stable. However, I've had device drivers bring
the system down. I had a condition where my HP PSC 950 drivers wouldn't let
me shutdown cleanly. I reinstalled Windows and the driver to fix it and it
still existed. Recently, I installed 2 new HDD's and striped them and
installed everything from scratch. I got the latest drivers from HP and
installed them and they now work fine. However, strangely, my PowerDVD
application won't play a DVD without crashing, and I can't burn a DVD with
Nero.

There are headaches associated with both operating systems. Nothing is
perfect.
 
i have had nvidea and ati videocard drivers conflict with something going on
in a web browser and cause a blue screen and a countdown to a memory dump.
in each case rolling back to an earlier driver solved the problem.

Oddly enough in each case the drivers were causing extra performance in
games it was only internet sites and even then only certain ones causing the
failure.
 
Back
Top