M
Milos Puchta
There were many connection to the port 1025 of internal hosts
accordind to the TCPviewer*) in LAN, that is secured by port
blocking only (ports 1-1024). Process tyhat are bound to this
behaviour are either lsass and netservices. The process analyzer*)
can give some detailed more info up to the threads but there is
no information about the process-to-port binding.
Can anyone guess the type of penetration, it seems that the port
80 was attacked originally?
TIA
Milos
*) Sysinternals, the latest versions
accordind to the TCPviewer*) in LAN, that is secured by port
blocking only (ports 1-1024). Process tyhat are bound to this
behaviour are either lsass and netservices. The process analyzer*)
can give some detailed more info up to the threads but there is
no information about the process-to-port binding.
Can anyone guess the type of penetration, it seems that the port
80 was attacked originally?
TIA
Milos
*) Sysinternals, the latest versions