G
Guest
MSN should use masculine pronouns with feminine pronouns in the paragraph
found in their Training website, or stick with non-sexist neutral pronouns.
Unless MSN is decidedly feminist, the excluse portrayal of bosses as all
being female is unrealistic, to say the least, and sexist, to use a familiar
"approbation." Although such grievances have been voiced by feminists and
feminist sympathizers about gender and authority, to frown upon masculine
only designations of positions (e.g. mailman), the exclusivisty, prejudice,
and unprofessionalism of the paragraph cited is an injustice against male
employers and egalitarianists--who desire equality between the sexes. MSN
should use both or neutral gender words in its appropriate context; boss is
not an exclusively female term.
found in their Training website, or stick with non-sexist neutral pronouns.
Unless MSN is decidedly feminist, the excluse portrayal of bosses as all
being female is unrealistic, to say the least, and sexist, to use a familiar
"approbation." Although such grievances have been voiced by feminists and
feminist sympathizers about gender and authority, to frown upon masculine
only designations of positions (e.g. mailman), the exclusivisty, prejudice,
and unprofessionalism of the paragraph cited is an injustice against male
employers and egalitarianists--who desire equality between the sexes. MSN
should use both or neutral gender words in its appropriate context; boss is
not an exclusively female term.