As to your first post, the answer is no.
The data in the combined table is actually a copy of each and every of
the other records in the other tables.
Now, since all of the tables appear to have the exact same structure
then instead of making the copies as we did, it may be possible to do a
very big UNION query. Now whether that would be too big / complex for
the query builder to handle I do not know.
The following is part of a posting about union queries that may give
you what you need:
=====================================================
I don't believe it's possible for a UNION query to multiply records. A
UNION
query can, however, subtract records. If you've got identical records
in two
(or more) of the tables, UNION will eliminate the duplicates. To
prevent
this from happening, use UNION ALL
Something I neglected to mention earlier was that should it be
desirable to
know from which table a given record came, you can add an extra field
to the
UNION query to indicate the source:
SELECT "Table1" AS Source, Field1, Field2, ... FROM Table1
UNION
SELECT "Table2" AS Source, Field1, Field2, ... FROM Table2
UNION
SELECT "Table3" AS Source, Field1, Field2, ... FROM Table3
UNION
SELECT "Table4" AS Source, Field1, Field2, ... FROM Table4
Doing that means that there cannot be duplicates among the subqueries
(unless, of course, the original tables contain duplicates), so no
records
will be eliminated as duplicates.
--
Doug Steele, Microsoft Access MVP
===============================================
Duplicates between queries may cause a problem.
Also remember that this does NOT make or constitute a back up of those
tables. It is simply a way of looking at the existing data. The number
of tables is what would worry me. Trying it is probably the only way of
finding out if it will work.
Also you cannot change the data on any of the records from access.(if I
remember correctly) since they are in spreadsheets.
Ron