Explain to me how having three different instances of Word is
somehow preferable to having one instance of Word with three
separate windows open - which is what 'Windows in the taskbar'
achieves. The types of document you have open are irrelevant, and
as one instance of Word has less processing overhead than three
versions, you could potentially have more open documents. By
opening more than one instance of Word you only succeed in
producing greater potential for conflict.
For me, the types of documents that are open are very relevant. I
might be working on several projects whose files I have open at the
same time, and I don't want them all mixed in together. Say I have
a dozen open documents from 3 projects. I definitely don't want a
dozen different windows (and a dozen taskbar buttons), so 'Windows in
TaskBar' isn't a good alternative. And having all 12 docs in the same
window makes finding the doc I want cumbersome.
The processing overhead doesn't seem to be a problem on my machine -
everything happens quickly. Maybe because most of my files are on the
small side? The two potential conflicts that I have run into require
a little discipline on my part, which is a worthwhile tradeoff
(changes to normal.dot and the MRU file list).
It's really a very handy way to work. I have one instance where I
have the current Jones Summary, cover letter, and old Summaries.
In another instance I'm working on the current Smith Summary and cover
letter, and have the old Summaries open. Ctrl-W is Next Window,
Shift-Ctrl-W is Previous Window, so I can quickly page thru the Jones
files when I'm in that instance, or the Smith files in that instance.
I really don't want to get Smith and Jones mixed up. And because of
the way I name files, the two taskbar buttons say Smith... or Jones...
Another twist to this is that I use multiple desktops. So another
desktop might have an instance of Word where I am working on a
Treasurer's Report and Alt-Tabbing between Word, Excel, and Quicken.
Andy