Thank you John,
I will do as you said and look at the examples, although I find them a bit
confusing if I try and relate them to my application. What I will do is
build the database like I want it and then upload it to the group for
criticism and suggestions to better the designs, if that is alright. I have
trimmed some of the fields and ended up with about 145.
Ummm... No. Please DON'T.
This is a text-only newsgroup. Uploading databases (or other binary
attachments) is NOT acceptable. If someone *volunteers* (perhaps in
response to a request) to look at it, you can Zip it and EMail it to
that person - but please don't post it here.
Again - if you have 145 fields in a table, *that's ten times too
many*. Read the links elsewhere in this thread about "normalization";
if you have repeating fields in your table (such as January, February,
.... or Field1, Field2, Field3, ...) then your table needs to be split
into two tables in a one-to-many relationship.
If you wish, you can post a *TEXT* description of your tables, with
the table names, the Primary Keys (specify the datatype), the defined
relationships, and perhaps a sampling of the fields within the tables.
John W. Vinson[MVP]