Anna said:
Ken:
This could be done, but since it appears a virtual certainty that her
present motherboard's BIOS supports large-capacity disks, wouldn't it be a
simple matter to just install SP1 or SP2 on her present machine? Why this
tortuous "workaround"? Or is this merely a theoretical question you're
raising?
As I understood the problem, she was wanting to install an early
version of XP on a HD that she was unable to partition to a size greater
than 137GB. Most stated that this was due to the fact that SP1 or SP2
was necessary for the partition to be created larger than that size. My
thinking was that if once the partition was made on XP that already had
the SP changes installed (such as another computer), that the drive
might be taken to her computer and formatted to its full capacity.
Later, she could install the SP updates without having to modify the
partition at all. I am asking, not TELLING. I have no idea if this
would work.
Is it a theoretical question? Yes, I guess it is as I was trying to
understand if it was limited to CREATING the partition, or applied to
FORMATTING and ACCESS as well? I just wondered if there was a way of
overcoming this 137GB limitation temporarily and not need a program like
Partition Magic to modify the partition size once her early version of
XP had been installed and updated to SP1 or later.
And if we want to continue to play this game...
Assuming she did not want to install SP1 or SP2 on her computer (for
whatever reason(s)), she could, on her present machine, use a Win9x/Me
Startup Disk or other DOS bootable floppy disk and create a single FAT32
partition on the 160 GB disk and then install XP on that partition which XP
will happily accept the created partition and then convert the FAT32
partition to NTFS if so desired. I realize this is going from the ridiculous
to the absurd, but there it is.
I am sorry to be so stupid about the limits of different OS's partition
size capabilities, but I am a curious person: First I am not suggesting
she not upgrade XP to the service packs. I gathered that there was a
problem creating the partition if her XP CD version did not have at
least SP1 incorporated in the CD? Admittedly, she could make multiple
partitions less than 137GB or a single one and later use a piece of
software such as PM to resize it. My questions addressed exactly what
limitations were.
Now I am probably again showing my ignorance, but can you partition a
160 GB HD using Win 98SE? I know that there was an upgrade
(263044USA8.EXE) which allowed partitions greater than 64GB, but does it
go up to 160GB? My current HD is not that large even though I still use
Win 98. And if it does, does this add on (263044USA8.EXE) to Win 98
create a boot disk with this capability, or must the partitioning take
place from a hard drive with this modification installed? The reason I
ask is the file FDISK on my computer is dated 5-18-2000 even though I
have installed the update. Since FDISK is the command for creating a
partition in Win 98, I would have thought the date of that file would
have changed after having installed the update?
In closing, let me say I am not trying to challenge your and others
comments. I am just trying to fully understand them. Perhaps my choice
of words could be better chosen, but they are not meant to belittle
anyone. Just to understand what options are available and why. Thanks
for your comments.
Ken