I know about the multi-line syntax, and how the rest of the world programs
code.
I do that because it's so more easier for me to read a page of code. And,
if another
Programmer looks at my code, there might be a brief cuss, but (s)he will
adapt.
W/ all the "white space" between code, I find it harder to read...at least
for me.
The question is not so much you find it easier to read, the question is do
you find it easier to maintain?
It's a little bit arrogance on your part to put your thumbs up to the whole
computing industry in general as to the coding standards they adopt.
The problem is not that other developers can't adapt to your coding style,
the problem is your coding style does not allow you to cut and paste lines
of code from different pieces of code throughout your application.
Furthermore it's always good to adopt a consistent coding style, but then
how are you going to incorporate any or many of the free code libraries and
examples you find on the Internet into your code? If you don't spend the
time to re-format the code, then you have an application with two completely
different coating styles. And, if you wanna keep consisting coding style,
then you'll have to reformat and rewrite large portions of code that you
reuse from other people's applications.
At a certain point this type of coding style constitutes wasting of company
resources, and virtually any experienced developer would tell you that.
Thus, what happens now when your current, or new boss googles here, and sees
how you are willfully, and knowingly wasting company resources?
Oh, remember me for all the embedded commas, double-quotes and linefeed??
I talked w/ a friend, and he showed me MS Scripting to completely clean a
text file,
and the Line Input the cleaned text file....works great, even when I tried
to mess it up w/ 2 - 3 linefeeds.
That's great, and I suggested to you that it makes a lot of sense to change
the format of the date BEFORE you attempt to import it into access, and it
seems you at least heeding some of my advice in this regards.