Extensible C#

  • Thread starter Thread starter Peter Gummer
  • Start date Start date
Peter Gummer said:
Has anyone tried Extensible C# (XC#) from ResolveCorp
(<http://www.resolvecorp.com/>)?
It looks good, it’s been around for a few years, but there seems to be
almost no mention of it on the web.
-- Peter Gummer
Click to expand...

It comes up now and then, but, personally, I don't care much for the whole
attribute approach.
 
Why do you need it AOP or just attrubuted
Its attributed programming ..... for real AOP compilers have to wait
and see until microsoft comes out....
Just to point out there is a EOS compiler which does not full fledged
byt good one
A simple article i had written long back
http://www.codeproject.com/csharp/AOP.asp
-------
Regards ,
C#, VB.NET , SQL SERVER , UML , DESIGN Patterns Interview question book
http://www.geocities.com/dotnetinterviews/
My Interview Blog
http://spaces.msn.com/members/dotnetinterviews/
 
Why do you need it AOP or just attrubuted
Click to expand...

The thing that interests me most about XC# is Design by Contract.

Aspect-oriented programming might be interesting in general, but I
definitely want Design by Contract.

Ideally I'd like to use Spec#, but it's just a research project, so for
the foreseeable future I need something like XC#.

-- Peter Gummer
 
Yuo may want to check out Microsoft Indigo...

--
HTH,

Kevin Spencer
Microsoft MVP
..Net Developer
Ambiguity has a certain quality to it.
 
Kevin said:
Microsoft Indigo
Click to expand...

Thanks. I suppose you're referring to Indigo's data contracts. As near
as I can figure out, this is not something I could use in every C#
method and class I ever write, which is the idea behind C#. And it
looks like you have to run some special tool.

And it's .NET 2.0, isn't it? I'm just using .NET 1.1.

So thanks, but it at a glance it doesn't look like true Design by
Contract.

-- Peter Gummer
 
Back
Top