G
Guest
Does Outlook have to be running (minimized) for the alarm function to work?
It seems to on my computer. No resident watchdog for alarms?
It seems to on my computer. No resident watchdog for alarms?
CMM said:Outlook- the one program that NEEDS it- would benefit from a tray applet
for the last 10 years. Instead, Windows users get a slew of useless stuff
(RealPlayer, QuickTime, reinvent-the-wheel Update Checkers, resource hogs)
in there.
Check out Outlook Loader at http://www.cflashsoft.com it does what you
want. It accomplishes what it does by keeping an instance of Outlook
loaded and hidden in the background... even if you close the Outlook
window. You get new email alerts, task alerts, and a bunch of stuff.
P.S. The Outlook 2003 "minimize to tray" thing is fairly stupid. I find
myself closing the Outlook window all the time... but, expect it to stay
loaded in the tray. My bad... it's not like EVERY other tray applet
behaves this way.
"Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook]"
Yes, it must be open to work. If you getting reminders, you probably
have
an instance of outlook.exe still active. Check in Task Manager.
--
Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook]
Post all replies to the group to keep the discussion intact. All
unsolicited mail sent to my personal account will be deleted without
reading.
After furious head scratching, Joe Busfield asked:
| Does Outlook have to be running (minimized) for the alarm function to
| work? It seems to on my computer. No resident watchdog for alarms?
CMM said:Check out Outlook Loader at http://www.cflashsoft.com it does what
you want. It accomplishes what it does by keeping an instance of
Outlook loaded and hidden in the background... even if you close the
Outlook window. You get new email alerts, task alerts, and a bunch of
stuff.
CMM said:- When I close the Yahoo Messenger window it gives me a "tip" that
it's still in the tray. Cool.
- Same when I close Windows Messenger. Again, the tray icon
represents a *tool* not a "window."
- Same for almost all "tray applets." Close the Volume window?... yup
volume icon still in the tray. Nice!
CMM said:Outlook- the one program that NEEDS it- would benefit from a tray applet
for the last 10 years. Instead, Windows users get a slew of useless stuff
(RealPlayer, QuickTime, reinvent-the-wheel Update Checkers, resource hogs)
in there.
Check out Outlook Loader at http://www.cflashsoft.com it does what you
want. It accomplishes what it does by keeping an instance of Outlook
loaded and hidden in the background... even if you close the Outlook
window. You get new email alerts, task alerts, and a bunch of stuff.
P.S. The Outlook 2003 "minimize to tray" thing is fairly stupid. I find
myself closing the Outlook window all the time... but, expect it to stay
loaded in the tray. My bad... it's not like EVERY other tray applet
behaves this way.
"Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook]"
Yes, it must be open to work. If you getting reminders, you probably
have
an instance of outlook.exe still active. Check in Task Manager.
--
Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook]
Post all replies to the group to keep the discussion intact. All
unsolicited mail sent to my personal account will be deleted without
reading.
After furious head scratching, Joe Busfield asked:
| Does Outlook have to be running (minimized) for the alarm function to
| work? It seems to on my computer. No resident watchdog for alarms?
Mark R Penn said:I don't suggest buying one just for this, but if you have a Pocket PC,
keeping it in the cradle will keep Outlook running as a process too.
I agree that there should be an Outlook service that can be kept running
constantly, so that the full app doesn't have to be open. The service
should (optionally) check new mail, and give alarms/reminders. It seams
ludicrous to me that a user has to keep OL running to get reminders - what
if I forget to start it because I couldn't see the reminder to start OL
On the assumption that a reminder, by it's nature, could go off at any
time, the argument that having a service running constantly could lead to
pst file corruption is moot - if I need the reminders, I need OL running
anyway, so a service is no more of a risk. Likewise if I need to know
about new mail as it arrives, I have to keep OL running too.
If ever there was an app that needs a service, it's Outlook.
Mark
CMM said:Outlook- the one program that NEEDS it- would benefit from a tray applet
for the last 10 years. Instead, Windows users get a slew of useless stuff
(RealPlayer, QuickTime, reinvent-the-wheel Update Checkers, resource
hogs) in there.
Check out Outlook Loader at http://www.cflashsoft.com it does what you
want. It accomplishes what it does by keeping an instance of Outlook
loaded and hidden in the background... even if you close the Outlook
window. You get new email alerts, task alerts, and a bunch of stuff.
P.S. The Outlook 2003 "minimize to tray" thing is fairly stupid. I find
myself closing the Outlook window all the time... but, expect it to stay
loaded in the tray. My bad... it's not like EVERY other tray applet
behaves this way.
"Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook]"
Yes, it must be open to work. If you getting reminders, you probably
have
an instance of outlook.exe still active. Check in Task Manager.
--
Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook]
Post all replies to the group to keep the discussion intact. All
unsolicited mail sent to my personal account will be deleted without
reading.
After furious head scratching, Joe Busfield asked:
| Does Outlook have to be running (minimized) for the alarm function to
| work? It seems to on my computer. No resident watchdog for alarms?
CMM said:Again, Outlook Loader does that. Not plugging my little creation (it's
free).... but it works exactly as you described.
http://www.cflashsoft.com/olload.htm
Mark R Penn said:I don't suggest buying one just for this, but if you have a Pocket PC,
keeping it in the cradle will keep Outlook running as a process too.
I agree that there should be an Outlook service that can be kept running
constantly, so that the full app doesn't have to be open. The service
should (optionally) check new mail, and give alarms/reminders. It seams
ludicrous to me that a user has to keep OL running to get reminders -
what if I forget to start it because I couldn't see the reminder to start
OL
On the assumption that a reminder, by it's nature, could go off at any
time, the argument that having a service running constantly could lead to
pst file corruption is moot - if I need the reminders, I need OL running
anyway, so a service is no more of a risk. Likewise if I need to know
about new mail as it arrives, I have to keep OL running too.
If ever there was an app that needs a service, it's Outlook.
Mark
CMM said:Outlook- the one program that NEEDS it- would benefit from a tray applet
for the last 10 years. Instead, Windows users get a slew of useless
stuff (RealPlayer, QuickTime, reinvent-the-wheel Update Checkers,
resource hogs) in there.
Check out Outlook Loader at http://www.cflashsoft.com it does what you
want. It accomplishes what it does by keeping an instance of Outlook
loaded and hidden in the background... even if you close the Outlook
window. You get new email alerts, task alerts, and a bunch of stuff.
P.S. The Outlook 2003 "minimize to tray" thing is fairly stupid. I find
myself closing the Outlook window all the time... but, expect it to stay
loaded in the tray. My bad... it's not like EVERY other tray applet
behaves this way.
"Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook]"
Yes, it must be open to work. If you getting reminders, you probably
have
an instance of outlook.exe still active. Check in Task Manager.
--
Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook]
Post all replies to the group to keep the discussion intact. All
unsolicited mail sent to my personal account will be deleted without
reading.
After furious head scratching, Joe Busfield asked:
| Does Outlook have to be running (minimized) for the alarm function to
| work? It seems to on my computer. No resident watchdog for alarms?