R
Rob Schneider
I was in a corporate technology course last few days. Heard that it was
the corporate technology position to discourage use of ftp on the
corporate tcp/ip network because ftp, "hogs" network bandwidth. They
explained that if a user were to download a big file file (not sure what
"big" is) that the network would be saturated and other users would be
adversely affected.
I never heard of this.
Does ftp do something "special" to grab the entire network bandwidth on
say a token ring (they still have a few of these) or a switched or
non-switched ethernet?
I had a hard time believing it. I always thought that TCP/IP networks
would approportion bandwidth to all demands ... yes, with multiple
simultanous demands and fixed bandwidth, things might slow down, but to
"hold on to and hog" all network resources ... I didn't think this possible.
True?
rms
the corporate technology position to discourage use of ftp on the
corporate tcp/ip network because ftp, "hogs" network bandwidth. They
explained that if a user were to download a big file file (not sure what
"big" is) that the network would be saturated and other users would be
adversely affected.
I never heard of this.
Does ftp do something "special" to grab the entire network bandwidth on
say a token ring (they still have a few of these) or a switched or
non-switched ethernet?
I had a hard time believing it. I always thought that TCP/IP networks
would approportion bandwidth to all demands ... yes, with multiple
simultanous demands and fixed bandwidth, things might slow down, but to
"hold on to and hog" all network resources ... I didn't think this possible.
True?
rms