=?Utf-8?B?Sm9hblJN?= said:
Yes, am aware of that one in Windows but I read somewhere that it is not as
efficient. Do you know anything about that? Joan
I am more and more tending to believe that except for extreme cases,
such as just having finished installing SP2, but otherwise for the
average user I really doubt anyone could detect the difference in
speed before versus after a defrag. The latest issue of one of the
PC magazines had a comment in it to the effect, for the average user
don't waste your time defragging the disk again and again and again.
Thus I really doubt you could tell the difference between a "more"
and a "less" efficient defrag tool.
I do realize this is a religious issue with many and they are out
there defragging their drive every twenty minutes, absolutely sure
that this is making a difference. But I'd bet money on a good
double blind test that they could never tell the difference.
If anyone has any *real data* to the contrary I'd love to see it.
And, this doesn't say that SP2 having sledge hammered your disk
won't then improve with one defrag, although I'd like some real data
to see just how much difference the defrag really makes there.