David Candy, follow-up: Looking for devices in all the wrong places

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jonathan Sachs
  • Start date Start date
J

Jonathan Sachs

David Candy: this is a follow-up to a thread I began late in May, when I was
trying to make Windows Backup display its initial "Looking for devices..."
message for a second or two, rather than as long as several minutes.

You may remember that my last message in this thread ended, "May I ask that
you please address the problem I brought here, instead of trying to help me
solve a different problem that seems easier?" I gather you were unable or
unwilling to do so, since you never replied.

It appears that I have now resolved the problem, so I am reporting back to
tell you what happened. I hope this will help you assist other users more
effectively in the future.

I described the problem in another forum which is largely concerned with
Microsoft products, but is not associated with Microsoft. The resident
experts did not know what was wrong, but one of them thought that it sounded
like a device driver problem, and suggested that I check the HP web site for
a new driver.

I was very skeptical about that, because I have been using HP DAT drives
with Microsoft's generic DAT driver at least since the days of Windows NT
4.0, and never had a problem. I did not believe that HP even offered a
proprietary Windows XP driver. I looked, though, and found that they do. I
installed it, and the problem is now gone.

I would not expect you to know this type of detail about the particular
device I'm using. The person who helped me did not know it, but he was able
to help me by taking a pragmatic approach to the situation instead of a
formulaic one.

He did not adopt the attitude that if I was dissatisfied with the
performance of Windows, my expectations, not the performance of windows,
should change.

He did not try to convince me to solve a problem different from the one I
brought to him because he knew how to solve that one.

When he found that he did not know the answer to my question, he referred me
to another source of information that seemed likely to be helpful.

I hope you will be able to develop the habit of responding in similar ways,
so that more of the people you try to help will feel that you have offered
them assistance rather than frustration.
 
Listen f*ckhead.
I tried to think of tests but then I thought no point unless one can
make the fault happen else...

Note the .... That requires you to supply information as there is no point testing something that is working perfectly. As you were unwilling to there's not much I can do. I gave you a work around that was also beyond you. You continued to snip my replies so how the f*ck would I have seen your last post. In short you are a f*cking idiot that expects people to search google to see what the f*ck a moron like you is babbling about.

So you were unwilling to provide information. You deleted all previous posts. You replied over 24 hours later and expect me to see it after you deleted all references to me. F*ck off you piece of dog shit.
 
I just went through the thread between yourself and David. You are a real
piece of work! David is trying to help you with a problem you are having. He
is asking for nothing in return. You then have the balls to tell him that he
is not helping you with the correct problem? I did not once read of you
stopping him and saying "But David, I am trying to figure out why I have the
variation in response time - instead you yammer on and on about this and
that in Task Scheduler. You, my dear Sir, are an IDIOT!! In the future
please address any and all questions to windowsxp.users.morons. For the
record, should I see you post again, I will warn everyone that you are an
ungrateful PR#$% !!
 
Back
Top