Yes, it is, which has been pointed out countless times here, but
nobody ever seems to listen. As such, it has all the security
holes that IE does.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I keep hearing about these supposed IE security holes, but in
years of using IE and IE+Maxthon, I have never been hit. I take
all the usual precautions and keep Windows updated regularly.
It seems to me the people doing the most whining about IE security
are non-users. What do they know about it anyway other than what's
parroted by other non-users?[/QUOTE]
I agree with you, but frankly, I think that's the case with both sides
of this long-running tale. There's way too much "my browser/your
browser" stuff that goes on. (They're browsers, not fecking
religions...)
Properly updated like any browser, IE is serving its users well
around the world. Maxthon only makes it better. I suspect IE7 is
going to destroy the competition, but we'll see.
I don't use IE, but I'd agree that way, way too much has been made of
the "drastic" fall in IE usage -- from >95% to, um, >90% or something.
It's still the gorilla in the forest, and likely to remain so.
How about this for contentious though (!): I've not had a virus of any
sort for over 6 years; I use very few MS products; BUT: I really
don't believe there's much of a correlation there.
I run a patched, clean machine, regularly scanned and maintained,
single-user (important, that one), and used with care. I'm fairly
certain that my strike rate on security issues wouldn't be much worse
if I was an IE/OE junkie instead of a Gecko/Poco/XNews junkie...
Security isn't system-dependent; it's operator-dependent.