case tool

[TonyJ]

Hello!!

Is it anyone that have some experience using a good case tool that support
C# design in using UML.
For example reverse engineering.
I have used the together case tool when I worked with the Java language.

//Tony

 

[Michael Nemtsev]

Hello TonyJ,

I have been use Sparx Enterprise Architect for 2 years and found it really
good

T> Is it anyone that have some experience using a good case tool that
T> support
T> C# design in using UML.
T> For example reverse engineering.
T> I have used the together case tool when I worked with the Java
T> language.

---
WBR, Michael Nemtsev [C# MVP].
My blog: http://spaces.live.com/laflour
Team blog: http://devkids.blogspot.com/

"The greatest danger for most of us is not that our aim is too high and we
miss it, but that it is too low and we reach it" (c) Michelangelo

 

[Ignacio Machin \( .NET/ C# MVP \)]

Hi,

Hello!!

Is it anyone that have some experience using a good case tool that support
C# design in using UML.
For example reverse engineering.
I have used the together case tool when I worked with the Java language.

I used Rational XDE for a while, but not sure if you still support .NET

 

[Peter Bradley]

We've used Select Enterprise, which is expensive, but good.

Visual Paradigm is also good and available in a number of different
versions. The top end version is almost as expensive as Select.

We found Sparx Enterprise architect to be cheap, but not as good by a long
way as the two mentioned above. We tried to get it to generate C# classes
for us, but it kept reverting back to Java. We gave up after a while.

Another one you might like to look at is Poseidon for UML - but IIRC it's
very Java based.

The Rolls Royce of UML CASE tools is still, arguably, Rational.

HTH


Peter

 

[José Joye]

I more than agree to it!

- José

 

[pfc_sadr]

it's too bad that MS _FORCES_ us to use OOP and then they don't offer
a tool for it?
it's too bad that MS _FORCES_ us to use OOP and then they don't offer
a tool for it?
it's too bad that MS _FORCES_ us to use OOP and then they don't offer
a tool for it?
it's too bad that MS _FORCES_ us to use OOP and then they don't offer
a tool for it?
it's too bad that MS _FORCES_ us to use OOP and then they don't offer
a tool for it?
it's too bad that MS _FORCES_ us to use OOP and then they don't offer
a tool for it?
it's too bad that MS _FORCES_ us to use OOP and then they don't offer
a tool for it?
it's too bad that MS _FORCES_ us to use OOP and then they don't offer
a tool for it?
it's too bad that MS _FORCES_ us to use OOP and then they don't offer
a tool for it?
it's too bad that MS _FORCES_ us to use OOP and then they don't offer
a tool for it?
it's too bad that MS _FORCES_ us to use OOP and then they don't offer
a tool for it?
it's too bad that MS _FORCES_ us to use OOP and then they don't offer
a tool for it?