L
Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]
Please fix your system date.
B
Bob I
Was changed for that post only 
J
John John
Why? Now it's always stuck there at the bottom of our "New
Headers/Messages" list. I guess we'll have to wait until December 31st
for it to disappear. Or until you cancel the message... which ever
comes first.
John
Headers/Messages" list. I guess we'll have to wait until December 31st
for it to disappear. Or until you cancel the message... which ever
comes first.
John
B
Bob I
Why would it be in New Headers if you have marked it read?
J
John John
It's marked as read but it's always there at the bottom because headers
are sorted by date, from oldest to newest. So your post will be down
there until December 31st passes then it will start to move up the list
like all the other posts. I always read the ng with headers sorted by
date order, I'm sure others do the same.
John
are sorted by date, from oldest to newest. So your post will be down
there until December 31st passes then it will start to move up the list
like all the other posts. I always read the ng with headers sorted by
date order, I'm sure others do the same.
John
Bob said:Why would it be in New Headers if you have marked it read?
John said:Why? Now it's always stuck there at the bottom of our "New
Headers/Messages" list. I guess we'll have to wait until December
31st for it to disappear. Or until you cancel the message... which
ever comes first.
John
Bob said:Was changed for that post only
Lanwench [MVP - Exchange] wrote:
Please fix your system date.
Bob I wrote:
BUMP SPAMMER
B
Bob I
Ok, reply to it and I'll see if I can pull the thread back in.
John said:It's marked as read but it's always there at the bottom because headers
are sorted by date, from oldest to newest. So your post will be down
there until December 31st passes then it will start to move up the list
like all the other posts. I always read the ng with headers sorted by
date order, I'm sure others do the same.
John
Bob said:Why would it be in New Headers if you have marked it read?
John said:Why? Now it's always stuck there at the bottom of our "New
Headers/Messages" list. I guess we'll have to wait until December
31st for it to disappear. Or until you cancel the message... which
ever comes first.
John
Bob I wrote:
Was changed for that post only
Lanwench [MVP - Exchange] wrote:
Please fix your system date.
Bob I wrote:
BUMP SPAMMER
J
John John
I think you guys are playing tricks on me. I see Ray posted on the same
subject dated a year ago. I'm easy to confuse just before supper hour,
my mind is on food... What's this "bump" thing supposed to do? Is it
because you sort by threads and want to collapse the thread and get rid
of it or what?
I hope I have a great big T-bone steak for supper... it'll be better
than that crow I had last night...
John
subject dated a year ago. I'm easy to confuse just before supper hour,
my mind is on food... What's this "bump" thing supposed to do? Is it
because you sort by threads and want to collapse the thread and get rid
of it or what?
I hope I have a great big T-bone steak for supper... it'll be better
than that crow I had last night...
John
Bob said:Ok, reply to it and I'll see if I can pull the thread back in.
John said:It's marked as read but it's always there at the bottom because
headers are sorted by date, from oldest to newest. So your post will
be down there until December 31st passes then it will start to move up
the list like all the other posts. I always read the ng with headers
sorted by date order, I'm sure others do the same.
John
Bob said:Why would it be in New Headers if you have marked it read?
John John wrote:
Why? Now it's always stuck there at the bottom of our "New
Headers/Messages" list. I guess we'll have to wait until December
31st for it to disappear. Or until you cancel the message... which
ever comes first.
John
Bob I wrote:
Was changed for that post only
Lanwench [MVP - Exchange] wrote:
Please fix your system date.
Bob I wrote:
BUMP SPAMMER
B
Bob I
BUMP SPAMMER