C
Chris Simpson
Where can I DL the latest version of Asus Probe, I looked on the web
site I could not find the tools section...
site I could not find the tools section...
Chris Simpson said:Where can I DL the latest version of Asus Probe, I looked on the web
site I could not find the tools section...
Chris said:Where can I DL the latest version of Asus Probe, I looked on the web
site I could not find the tools section...
Ben Pope said:Don't bother... grab MBM5, it's loads better.
Under support/downloads.
Phil said:All a matter of opinion....
=|[ Ben Pope's ]|= said:Phil said:All a matter of opinion....
Probe doesn't grab the diode temperature (at least on my board)... so it's
pretty useless for temperature monitoring.
Ben
Creeping said:=|[ Ben Pope's ]|= said:Probe doesn't grab the diode temperature (at least on my board)... soPhil said:news:[email protected]...
it's pretty useless for temperature monitoring.
Come off it ;]
Neither MBM or Probe can read the diode temp on my board - but the
available sensors are far from 'useless'![]()
=|[ Ben Pope's ]|= said:Creeping said:=|[ Ben Pope's ]|= said:Phil wrote:
Probe doesn't grab the diode temperature (at least on my board)... so
it's pretty useless for temperature monitoring.
Come off it ;]
Neither MBM or Probe can read the diode temp on my board - but the
available sensors are far from 'useless'![]()
Socket temp doesn't really give you a good impression of diode temp. If I
subtract socket temp from diode temps, I've seen anything from +15°C
to -5°C. 20°C of variation is hardly ideal, especially as many people seem
to think cpu temp (diode) is cpu temp (socket).
I'll change my statement fro "useless" to "misleading at best" - thats
assuming it calls the socket temp "cpu temp", which I think it does.
Ben
Creeping said:=|[ Ben Pope's ]|= said:Socket temp doesn't really give you a good impression of diode temp. If
I subtract socket temp from diode temps, I've seen anything from +15°C
to -5°C. 20°C of variation is hardly ideal, especially as many people
seem to think cpu temp (diode) is cpu temp (socket).
I'll change my statement fro "useless" to "misleading at best" - thats
assuming it calls the socket temp "cpu temp", which I think it does.
I would like to read the diode temp - but then, to think of that as the
'real' temp is a matter of context too. So its a more reactive, relevant
indicator than the board cpu temp, the other sensor lags behind, but I
find it sufficient to judge how hot its running in the medium term.
Id only be mislead by it, if I didnt wait for it to plateau, or if I was
taking it as being securely calibrated - I take it as a laggy stress level
indicator which loosely relates to temp..
hehe, sure the diode might be handy.
Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?
You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.