P
Phil Townsend
I have been attempting to persuade our systems admin staff to allow us
to use integrated security by adding the aspnet user to SQL Server.
Currently we are forced to use a connection string that passes user
names/passwords on the conncetion string itself. i know that using
integrated security is a more secure way of doing this. However, our
systems admin is saying that this is not poosible on our current
configuration of Win2000 and IIS 5.0 as the aspnet user is not a domain
level account. They are also concerned that if the aspnet user is
granted access to one application, then that application would have
access to other .net web apps on the same db server. Is this a valid
response?
Also, could security on this server be better addressed by setting up
each application to run under seperate instances of sql server running
on one machine? I have read some about this but have never seen it in
place.
Thanks...
to use integrated security by adding the aspnet user to SQL Server.
Currently we are forced to use a connection string that passes user
names/passwords on the conncetion string itself. i know that using
integrated security is a more secure way of doing this. However, our
systems admin is saying that this is not poosible on our current
configuration of Win2000 and IIS 5.0 as the aspnet user is not a domain
level account. They are also concerned that if the aspnet user is
granted access to one application, then that application would have
access to other .net web apps on the same db server. Is this a valid
response?
Also, could security on this server be better addressed by setting up
each application to run under seperate instances of sql server running
on one machine? I have read some about this but have never seen it in
place.
Thanks...