ASP.NET 2.0

  • Thread starter Thread starter JezB
  • Start date Start date
J

JezB

Can I ask ASP.NET 2.0 questions in here ? I can't find any groups specific
to Whidbey.
What I'm after is the list of minimum requirements for the servers that we
might deploy an ASP.NET 2.0 application to.
 
Although you could post questions about
ASP.NET 2.0 here, if clearly identified,
but your best bet is to go to specialized 2.0
discussion groups, like
http://www.asp.net/Forums/ShowForumGroup.aspx?tabindex=1&ForumGroupID=26

You will need to register to post questions, but it's free.

No need to register if you're just browsing
or searching the database.

For specifics about migrating from previous versions
of ASP.NET to ASP.NET 2.0, see
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/d...ry/en-us/dnvs05/html/migratefromaspnetto2.asp

For general background info on ASP.NET 2.0,
see http://msdn.microsoft.com/asp.net/whidbey/default.aspx
and http://beta.asp.net/

As far as "minimum requirements for the servers",
the rule of thumb is : the bigger the better. :-)

Joking aside, the requirements would depend
on what your applications are targeted to do.

Discounting HDD space ( I assume you'll have plenty of that )...

If your apps will have 1,000 hits a day,
you could probably get by with a 2 Ghz
processor and 512 MB ram.

My development box runs on that, and does well.
I wouldn't recommend running a *server* on that,
but since you asked for a *minimal* install, that'd do.

VS.NET will take any amount of RAM you throw at it,
and the faster the processor(s) is/are, the better your
performance will be.

If you're going to have 20-100,000 hits daily,
you might want to up that to a multi-processor
( 2-4 CPUs ) server with at least 1 GB ram
per processor.

Any more hits than that, and you'd
do well to consider a server cluster
and use Network Load balancing.

Then, you need to spec your SQL Server machine(s).

:-)



Juan T. Llibre
ASP.NET MVP
===========
 
JezB:
You can ask 2.0 questions here. There are specific groups available for
Whidbey however. They are in the microsoft.private space instead of public
which could explain why you can't find them. The are also password
protected, but the password is openly available, check out:
http://communities.microsoft.com/newsgroups/default.asp?icp=whidbey&slcid=us

My guess is that the req's for 2.0 won't be any/much different than those
for 1.0...of course, until beta2 and the go-live license is available, it's
all speculation.

Karl
 
Back
Top