NC Beach Bum said:
Don't get me wrong - I love MS Access. What I am looking for is a bit
more
polish and I was thinking that maybe VB could provide that polish.
However,
if someone would be willing to spend a bit of time to look over a three
screen shots and provide a few critical comments and offer suggestions on
making improvements then that would be great. Is someone interested?
You
can contact me directly at (e-mail address removed)
Oh, maybe you mean what my clients would call "glitz and glitter". My
clients want Access to address business problems, but none of them wants to
spend a nanocent on "glitz and glitter."
My experience with VB was with "classic VB" which did give you "closer
control over the UI" and for which there were uncounted numbers of
third-party ActiveX Controls that you could purchase. What else it entailed
was at least three times the time and effort to implement identical
applications, and high costs if you opted to get third-part ActiveX
Controls... some of which you'd need just to match the built-in controls in
Access.
VB.NET also has extra capabilities in this area. My observation is that it
has a significant learning curve, and that third-party Controls are usually
even more expensive than their classic VB counterparts. Some who are more
knowledgeable about it than I am expect that the next release, or perhaps
the one after that, may live up to the original promises for
easy-to-develop, easy-to-use Windows applications, but think that now it is
primarily useful for web-based applications. There is _not_, however, as far
as I know, _conversion software_ to convert an Access application to a
VB.NET application, so you should expect to re-create the application, but
likely be able to use the database that you already have.
Larry Linson
Microsoft Access MVP