Any freeware for registry fixes?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guest
  • Start date Start date
G

Guest

I recently performed a free scan which indicated that I had numerous registry
problems that required fixes. However, the same scanning software will not
fix the problems without subscribing/buying the actual software. Does anyone
know of any freeware that can fix registry problems?
 
Hummer5 said:
I recently performed a free scan which indicated that I had numerous registry
problems that required fixes. However, the same scanning software will not
fix the problems without subscribing/buying the actual software. Does anyone
know of any freeware that can fix registry problems?

www.ccleaner.com Be sure and back up the registry issues it clears up
when prompted to do so. If you ever have to undo it, just right click on
the saved file and select "merge".

Alias
 
Hummer5 said:
I recently performed a free scan which indicated that I had
numerous registry problems that required fixes. However, the
same scanning software will not fix the problems without
subscribing/buying the actual software. Does anyone know of
any freeware that can fix registry problems?

Just out of curiosity, what was the name of the "free scan" you
ran and how did you first find out about this program? If it
came to your attention through some sort of popup ad or
message, odds are it's a scam. The idea is to report phony
registry problems to make you think something is wrong with
your computer. They want to scare you into sending them some of
your hard earned dollars for a program that you don't need.

You'll get differing opinions on the subject but I've always
felt that registry cleaners, free or not, were ineffective and
potentially damaging. If you blindly follow their direction,
there's always the chance that you'll remove a legitimate
registry key.

If I need to restore registry settings I prefer to rely on
System Restore. To backup registry files, ERUNT does the job:

ERUNT The Emergency Recovery Utility NT
http://www.larshederer.homepage.t-online.de/erunt/

Good luck

Nepatsfan
 
I can't remember the name of the program as I have already removed it,
however, it was one that was recommended in an article I read on the "PC
World" web site.
 
Hummer5 said:
I recently performed a free scan which indicated that I had numerous registry
problems that required fixes. However, the same scanning software will not
fix the problems without subscribing/buying the actual software. Does anyone
know of any freeware that can fix registry problems?

You should stay away from registry cleaners unless you know what you are
doing. They can cause more harm than good.
 
beamish said:
Hello, Do not know about registry problems, but if you want a free registry
cleaner "Google" is your friend.
I use these two: http://www.hoverdesk.net/freeware.htm (regseeker)
and jv16powertools v1.3.0.195 the last free version.
Take Care.
beamish.

Thanks to all who have replied. As I would consider myself a novice insofar
as the features of registry are concerned, I think I will just leave matters
as is. Based on a couple of replies as well as my own intuition, I think I
could possibly end up doing more harm than good. Once again, thanks to all.
 
Hummer5 said:
Thanks to all who have replied. As I would consider myself a novice insofar
as the features of registry are concerned, I think I will just leave matters
as is. Based on a couple of replies as well as my own intuition, I think I
could possibly end up doing more harm than good. Once again, thanks to all.

You're welcome.
 
=?Utf-8?B?SHVtbWVyNQ==?= said:
I recently performed a free scan which indicated that I had numerous registry
problems that required fixes. However, the same scanning software will not
fix the problems without subscribing/buying the actual software. Does anyone
know of any freeware that can fix registry problems?

It's a waste of money to pay for any app that "cleans" the registry. Use
one of the many free ones instead.

http://personal.inet.fi/business/toniarts/files/EClea2_0.exe
 
=?Utf-8?B?SHVtbWVyNQ==?= said:
I can't remember the name of the program as I have already removed it,
however, it was one that was recommended in an article I read on the "PC
World" web site.

Note that one can easily get a good recommendation in a magazine/webzine
by simply buying enough ads in another magazine/webzine produced by the
same company. Easy as pie, in fact. eg utility recommendations are
often driven by money, not quality.
 
Hummer5 said:
I recently performed a free scan which indicated that I had numerous registry
problems that required fixes. However, the same scanning software will not
fix the problems without subscribing/buying the actual software. Does anyone
know of any freeware that can fix registry problems?


Those alleged registry "problems" are false alarms, reported by an
unscrupulous software vendor who wants to sell you a snake oil remedy
for a non-existent problem. It plain English, it's a scam. If you're
not actually experiencing real problems, ignore the results of this free
"scanner."

What specific problem are you experiencing that you *know* beyond
all reasonable doubt will be fixed by using a registry cleaner? If you
do have a problem that is rooted in the registry, it would be far better
to simply edit (after backing up, of course) only the specific key(s)
and/or value(s) that are causing the problem. Why use a shotgun when a
scalpel will do the job? Additionally, the manually changing of one or
two registry entries is far less likely to have the dire consequences of
allowing an automated product to make multiple changes simultaneously.

The registry contains all of the operating system's "knowledge" of
the computer's hardware devices, installed software, the location of the
device drivers, and the computer's configuration. A misstep in the
registry can have severe consequences. One should not even turning
loose a poorly understood automated "cleaner," unless he is fully
confident that he knows *exactly* what is going to happen as a result of
each and every change. Having seen the results of inexperienced people
using automated registry "cleaners," I can only advise all but the most
experienced computer technicians (and/or hobbyists) to avoid them all. I
will concede that a good registry scanning tool, in the hands of an
experienced and knowledgeable technician or hobbyist can be a useful
time-saving tool, as long as it's not allowed to make any changes
automatically. But I really don't think that there are any registry
cleaners that are truly safe for the general public to use. Experience
has shown me that such tools simply are not safe in the hands of the
inexperienced user.

The only thing needed to safely clean your registry is knowledge
and Regedit.exe. If you lack the knowledge and experience to maintain
your registry by yourself, then you also lack the knowledge and
experience to safely configure and use any automated registry cleaner,
no matter how safe they claim to be.

Further, no one has ever demonstrated, to my satisfaction, that the
use of an automated registry cleaner, particularly by an untrained,
inexperienced computer user, does any real good. There's certainly been
no empirical evidence offered to demonstrate that the use of such
products to "clean" WinXP's registry improves a computer's performance
or stability.

I always use Regedit.exe. I trust my own experience and judgment
far more than I would any automated registry cleaner. I strongly
encourage others to acquire the knowledge, as well.




--

Bruce Chambers

Help us help you:



You can have peace. Or you can have freedom. Don't ever count on having
both at once. - RAH
 
Hummer5 said:
I can't remember the name of the program as I have already removed it,
however, it was one that was recommended in an article I read on the "PC
World" web site.

PC World is a commercial site, driven by entirely advertising dollars.
Any product recommended or given a good review by PC World (just as
one would for any product being pushed by any commercial site) should be
looked at with a great deal of skepticism. If at all possible, seek out
neutral or non-commercial (from Consumer Reports, for example) reviews
of the same products before trying them.


--

Bruce Chambers

Help us help you:



You can have peace. Or you can have freedom. Don't ever count on having
both at once. - RAH
 
Bruce said:
PC World is a commercial site, driven by entirely advertising dollars.
Any product recommended or given a good review by PC World (just as
one would for any product being pushed by any commercial site) should
be looked at with a great deal of skepticism. If at all possible,
seek out neutral or non-commercial (from Consumer Reports, for
example) reviews of the same products before trying them.


I strongly second the above, but wanted to add another point. Even if you
ignore the commercial interests of Magazines/Sites like PC World, another
issue is the competence of their reviewers. Somebody isn't an expert on
something just because he writes for a magazine. As a single example, a
number of years ago, I had a young woman working for me whose previous job
was as a staff writer/reviewer for PC Magazine. Although she was a skilled
writer, she could barely spell "PC" and wasn't at all competent to write
reviews about personal computer products.
 
I strongly second the above, but wanted to add another point. Even if you
ignore the commercial interests of Magazines/Sites like PC World, another
issue is the competence of their reviewers. Somebody isn't an expert on
something just because he writes for a magazine. As a single example, a
number of years ago, I had a young woman working for me whose previous job
was as a staff writer/reviewer for PC Magazine. Although she was a skilled
writer, she could barely spell "PC" and wasn't at all competent to write
reviews about personal computer products.


A very good point, Ken. Thanks for adding it. Another prime example
of a journalist with little or no apparent technical knowledge (beyond
vocabulary, that is) would be Frank Langa.

--

Bruce Chambers

Help us help you:



You can have peace. Or you can have freedom. Don't ever count on having
both at once. - RAH
 
This has all been very enlightening and I hope other users in this newsgroup
have become a little wiser just like I have. To all who have contributed to
this thread, I admire your generosity in sharing your time and knowledge. I
am now convinced that I will leave my registry alone as I certainly don't
have the expertise to administer whatever would be necessary. As a matter of
information, I subsequently located the name of the freeware which I first
used to perform a free scan. Its titled "PC OnPoint". Does anyone want to
take this thread further and comment on this freeware for the benefit of
others who use this newsgroup? Once again, thanks to all.
 
I strongly second the above, but wanted to add another point. Even if you
ignore the commercial interests of Magazines/Sites like PC World, another
issue is the competence of their reviewers. Somebody isn't an expert on
something just because he writes for a magazine. As a single example, a

Somebody can get a job with a PC magazine with NO experience whatsoever
repairing PCs with problems. Yet, they can often write about it.
 
x-no-archive: yes
A very good point, Ken. Thanks for adding it. Another prime example
of a journalist with little or no apparent technical knowledge (beyond
vocabulary, that is) would be Frank Langa.

I myself was a highly paid documentation writer for many years,
serving such "big" guys as DOD, Microsoft, Boeing, Systems Northwest
(Remote DOD apps), Seattle Silicon Technology (who developed the Xerox
which BECAME the Apple MacIntosh, then Windows).

I was a very competent JOURNALIST (BA PhotoJournalism), but had no
shred of technical experience / knowledge / understanding. I wrote by
interviewing techs, programmers, engineers, and merging "technical
info" intelligently into coherent docs and articles.

As technology turned 286s into ..... Pentiums, I got left behind,
having NO head whatever for the finer points of technology.

Merely because one is a competent writer does not make one a competent
science writer.

Merely because one has an IQ off the charts and can design atom bombs
and ICs blindfolded doesn't qualify one to WRITE about it.


My complaint about Microsoft -- and part of why I no longer work for
Microsoft-- is that they could not care less about documenting their
products. They sell them document-less, and then SELL "Help line"
time.

I asked a "lead" once why they don't hire more qualified writers. She
said, "If we did that, we wouldn't be able to sell "Help Desk" to the
tune of $50 an hour (I'm sure it's gone up.) for each product we
sell."



Tallahassee
 
x-no-archive: yes
Somebody can get a job with a PC magazine with NO experience whatsoever
repairing PCs with problems. Yet, they can often write about it.


Yep, it's called an intelligent WRITER who can pick the brain of the
tech and be able to write coherently about it.

I did such for 20 years quite successfully.

The engineer gets the final review for technical accuracy; the writer
gets the final review for coherence.


Tallahassee
 
Back
Top