P
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
H
HVS
On 29 May 2006, philo wrote
Looks interesting; it's an IE shell, though, in case that matters
to anyone.
Looks interesting; it's an IE shell, though, in case that matters
to anyone.
K
KBB
I
Ian Edmont
KBB said:Do we need yet another one?
KBB
Be nice to have one to compete with Opera in the speed stakes. Back up and
forwarding to pages is very fast, even on my slow machine!
Any competition?
Ian Edmont.
H
HVS
On 29 May 2006, Ian Edmont wrote
??? Opera isn't an IE shell -- that is, it doesn't use the IE
rendering engine. Comparing IE-based shells with non-IE-based
browsers isn't comparing like with like.
There are all sorts of IE shells; dunno if this one is the
fastest, but it's only comparable within the category of IE
shells.
Be nice to have one to compete with Opera in the speed stakes.
??? Opera isn't an IE shell -- that is, it doesn't use the IE
rendering engine. Comparing IE-based shells with non-IE-based
browsers isn't comparing like with like.
Back up and forwarding to pages is very fast, even on my slow
machine!
Any competition?
There are all sorts of IE shells; dunno if this one is the
fastest, but it's only comparable within the category of IE
shells.
I
Ian Edmont
HVS said:On 29 May 2006, Ian Edmont wrote
??? Opera isn't an IE shell -- that is, it doesn't use the IE
rendering engine. Comparing IE-based shells with non-IE-based
browsers isn't comparing like with like.
Yes sorry. I overlooked the point that we were comparing IE shells. Just a
passing comment on Opera and the like really.