2000 Exchange Server Rules Storage Space Issue

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guest
  • Start date Start date
G

Guest

Until recently my firm used Exchange 2000. On my system I get the Outlook
2000 error: "There is not enough space on the Microsoft Exchange Server to
store all your rules. The rules that failed to upload have been deactivated."

It would give this message even if I made all my rules Client-Only (if its
client only, why must it be saved on the server!?)

I found a post in this forum from August 2004 that inquired about this
issue. A helpful person pointed the inquiree to the following article:
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=241325

My question is as follows: Our firm has been upgrading to Exchange 2003 and
Office 2003 and is nearly finished. Does this issue persist in the newer
versions of Office/Exchange?

In a previous job we used Eudora as a front end (who knows what the backend
was) and I was able to have hundreds of client-app rules for incoming mail.
Its extraordinarily annoying to constantly run up against this limitation.

Anyone know anything about the newest versions of Outlook and this issue?

Damian Carrillo
 
Damian said:
Until recently my firm used Exchange 2000. On my system I get the
Outlook 2000 error: "There is not enough space on the Microsoft
Exchange Server to store all your rules. The rules that failed to
upload have been deactivated."

It would give this message even if I made all my rules Client-Only
(if its client only, why must it be saved on the server!?)
<snip>

In addition to Neo's reply - the rules live in your mailbox. So yes, they
are still stored on the server, even if they're client side rules.
Simplify your rules/delete some.
 
That's ridiculous! How could such an annoying feature persist for so long.
I can only implement about 30% of the rules I need on Outlook. I've
simplified with distribution lists, combined multiple conditions into single
rules, etc etc but it still isn't enough! Is this a "feature" or is it
something they are going to fix someday?
 
Damian Carrillo said the following on 3/11/2005 8:31 PM:
I found a post in this forum from August 2004 that inquired about this
issue. A helpful person pointed the inquiree to the following article:
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=241325

There is a new article:
http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=886616

--
Alex Yu
http://mucha.us/blogs/alex/

This posting represents my own opinion, and in no way claims
to represent the views of Microsoft Corporation. This posting
is provided "as is" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
Please do not send e-mail directly to this alias. This alias
is for newsgroup purposes only.
 
Damian said:
That's ridiculous! How could such an annoying feature persist for so
long. I can only implement about 30% of the rules I need on Outlook.
I've simplified with distribution lists, combined multiple conditions
into single rules, etc etc but it still isn't enough! Is this a
"feature" or is it something they are going to fix someday?

I have no idea - it's a common complaint.
Personally, I use about two or three rules, tops, ever, as I find that it's
far too easy for things to get lost if I over-automate them. But that's just
me.
 
Back
Top