Poor humaneyes

Discussion in 'Microsoft Dot NET' started by *«Ë²´*, Aug 23, 2007.

  1. *«Ë²´*

    *«Ë²´* Guest

    We had the same experiences with bad quality humaneyes. No after sell services, it's really sucks.
     
    *«Ë²´*, Aug 23, 2007
    #1
    1. Advertisements

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.
Similar Threads
  1. Helge

    W3WP poor performance

    Helge, Mar 14, 2005, in forum: Microsoft Dot NET
    Replies:
    1
    Views:
    242
    Scott Allen
    Mar 14, 2005
  2. Guest

    .NET poor threading architecture?

    Guest, Jun 14, 2006, in forum: Microsoft Dot NET
    Replies:
    2
    Views:
    199
    Guest
    Jun 14, 2006
  3. Guest

    Poor response on these newsgroups.

    Guest, Oct 5, 2006, in forum: Microsoft Dot NET
    Replies:
    15
    Views:
    348
    Martin S
    Oct 24, 2006
  4. Humanass

    Humaneyes sucks!

    Humanass, Aug 4, 2007, in forum: Microsoft Dot NET
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    237
    Humanass
    Aug 4, 2007
  5. Humanass

    Humaneyes sucks!

    Humanass, Aug 4, 2007, in forum: Microsoft Dot NET
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    185
    Humanass
    Aug 4, 2007
  6. *«Ë²´*

    Poor humaneyes

    *«Ë²´*, Aug 23, 2007, in forum: Microsoft Dot NET
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    320
    *«Ë²´*
    Aug 23, 2007
  7. Mike Hofer

    Method Name Suggestion: Validate a Poor Choice?

    Mike Hofer, Oct 11, 2007, in forum: Microsoft Dot NET
    Replies:
    31
    Views:
    606
    Brian Gideon
    Oct 21, 2007
Loading...