frogspawn said:
What is missing from the Home version that anyone would notice?"
"Anyone" is all of humanity, and we all have different needs. However,
many
folks feel the need to upgrade to "pro" despite having no ability to
take
advantage of its additional features. They post here all the time, and
are
gently directed not to bother. Pro is not a better OS in the generic
sense,
but only if your specifics match its few additional features. I
suspect some
people want to spend the extra bucks for the ego boost.
If the user has need to for the Pro features then getting the Home
version is the *wrong* choice. Home doesn't include EFS (encryption
file service). Without EFS, I can take your hard drive regardless of
what permissions you used to protect your files and I can then read,
delete, and edit all your files. Everything yours can be mine. I
needed EFS since physical access to my desktop cannot be restricted.
Windows XP (Home or Pro) does need improvement regarding its login
security to prevent cracking. I also need support for offline
files/folders (so I can use them when not connected to the file server).
When I add another drive, I'll use dynamic disk support to convert my OS
partition to a dyanamic volume and then add the freespace on the new
drive to simply enlarge my C: drive rather than have separate C: and D:
drives (I already have another drive as D: where all my data gets
stored, so I'll want to expand C: when another drive is added). Pro
includes the Fax Service and client so I don't need to bother with 3rd
party software, like Winfax Basic. I only send maybe one fax per year
so I don't need the bloat of a huge fax program (and which is a defunct
product in the case of Winfax). These features are not available in the
Home version.
See
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/pro/howtobuy/choosing2.mspx for a
comparision of features between the Home and Pro versions. If you don't
need the features the Pro version has over the Home version, like for an
immobile desktop at home, then the Home version will probably suffice.