G
glee
Bill in Co said:glee said:Bill in Co said:glee wrote:
glee wrote:
message
In message <[email protected]>, glee
message
In message <[email protected]>, glee
[]
No.... there is no "virus" involved at all. Learn the
difference
between a virus, a trojan, a worm, a root kit....
nomenclature
is
important. Imagine if your doctor didn't know the difference
between a virus and a bacteria...
I'd hope my doctor would know that if it was "a", it's
bacterium
(-:
...
grammar nazi!
Not really; you think it's important to know the difference
between
a virus, trojan, worm, rootkit (and so on), as do I - but I
_would_
have
somewhat less regard for a doctor who said "a bacteria". OK,
it's
not
as important as knowing the difference between one and a virus,
but it's the sort of attention to detail that, if missed, would
make
me wonder what else the doctor might miss.
You must be seriously bored today. I have heard a number of
quite
good doctors say "a bacteria"... it is acceptable, because they
are
referring
to a group or family of bacteria. Biologists may talk about a
single
bacterium, but they don't just occur singly in an infection where
a
doctor deals with them. A doctor may refer to the group, such as
staph or strep or MRSA, as a bacteria.
Your quibbling over the inclusion of the "a" is what is called
being a grammar nazi.
:-( I'm really cringing at reading that, even though I wasn't
in
WWII.
I think it would be good if we'd all refrained from using that
term
so flippantly, as occasionally seems to be in vogue these days, as
there really was no humor in it for those who have suffered its
legacy,
many of whom are still around.
Apparently you aren't familiar with the humorous allusion the
Seinfeld's 'soup nazi'. The term nazi applies to far more than just
WWII.
No I'm not. But regardless of Seinfield, I stand by what I said.
If Seinfield (who produced the TV series) is too young to "get it"
(and I guess he is, since he was born in 1954), I can't help that.
We
all know, or rather SHOULD know, what that term connotates. And
platitudes don't cut it. There is nothing comedic about it.
Your opinion. "Nazi" is not a bad term.
It's not just "my opinion". The term is notorious. And how you can
even defend it is beyond comprehension. But then again, I wasn't
born in the recent decades, where the past and its legacies are long
forgotten. And I feel sorry for this generation.
I guess the old adage is true: as a society, we both forget, and never
learn much of anything, from the past. It's either forgotten, or
never even known. And on occasions, can even become a joking matter.
Maybe it wouldn't be so funny if some (including Seinfield and his
writers) were living in London at that time?? Or at the very least,
grew up with family who suffered through its legacy. There is nothing
funny about that term in ANY context. Then again, looking at society
today, maybe I shouldn't be so surprised.
Oh, come off your pontificating high horse, Bill. The term is not
"notorious", it is the name of Hitler's political party. Yes, they
waged a war of conquest and were responsible for the holocaust, that
doesn't make the word taboo, for god's sake. That's ridiculous. By
that standard, we can't mention the Emperor of Japan or Shintoism
either. Nor can we use any words involving the communist Chinese
because of their gross human rights violations. The word 'jihad' in
your world must be not allowed either in any humorous form of usage
because it is connected with terrorism.
Your condescending rant about forgetting the past and "not being old
enough" to understand the "legacy" is just pure BS. I grew up with
neighbors who had lived through the holocaust... there are still
survivors of it who, guess what, have a sense of humor and laugh at
Seinfeld's soup nazi. Your periodic berating of those slightly younger
than you that lack your "integrity" is getting old.