Re: Using my extra RAM for other things in an old, updated 32-bitXP Pro. SP3.

Discussion in 'Windows XP Hardware' started by Paul, Dec 23, 2010.

  1. Paul

    Paul Guest

    Ant wrote:
    > On 12/23/2010 4:04 AM PT, Richard Owlett typed:
    >>> I heard that I can use the unused memory for other things like a RAM
    >>> drive for swap files, %temp%, etc. How do I do that?
    >>> [snip]

    >> I suspect you heard a reference to expanded memory and/or extended
    >> memory from DOS era. See:

    > Yes. I was told that using unused RAM like a RAM drive but others says
    > no in these newsgroups. :(

    There are two ways to get to memory.

    It's really a question of control. If you had control of the
    entire OS and its facilities, then there are ways to get around
    the limitation. Of course, if you had control of the OS, then
    you wouldn't need all the silliness in the first place. (Just
    use PAE, the way it was intended. That would give a 32 bit OS
    access to up to 64GB of memory.)

    What you're really looking for, is a back door left open by Microsoft,
    that would allow bypassing the current limitation. Going back to
    SP1, might be the quickest way to get there.

    The bottom of this article, gives a hint. It uses a hardware card
    and driver, to get at memory above 4GB.

    "That means PAE-aware drivers can actually use physical space
    above 4 GB if they want. For example, drivers could map the
    “lost” memory regions located above 4 GB and expose this memory
    as a RAM disk."

    Now, even with those statements, that isn't a complete solution. To
    make that into an "Extended" or "Expanded" kind of memory scheme,
    and makes it seamless, still requires a lot of low level hooks being
    left available by the OS. Just the ability for a PCI or PCI Express
    card, to reach high memory, isn't a complete solution. You need the
    same hooks, as are used for swapping virtual memory to disk. In a
    sense, the OS would need to be made aware, that there was more than
    4GB of memory in use. And what are the odds, that Microsoft
    left that door open ? They wouldn't have imposed the limitation,
    via translation tables, of 4GB, only to leave the ability to
    use hardware DMA to expand the space.

    The perfect vehicle for implementation, would be a PCI Express x16
    video card. It would make a great DMA engine, with high transfer
    speeds for block memory transfer. You could probably move data with
    one of those, as fast as the memory subsystem could run (16GB/sec
    best case, as PCI Express is full duplex). But you need a TLB miss,
    to trigger your video card driver, to page in the requested memory.
    Or something along those lines.

    Paul, Dec 23, 2010
    1. Advertisements

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

It takes just 2 minutes to sign up (and it's free!). Just click the sign up button to choose a username and then you can ask your own questions on the forum.
Similar Threads
  1. Vote for Pedro
    Dec 22, 2010
  2. Ken Blake, MVP
    Ken Blake, MVP
    Dec 25, 2010
  3. Paul
    Yousuf Khan
    Dec 26, 2010
  4. Patok
  5. Linea Recta
    Linea Recta
    Dec 27, 2011