Re: FAX Software for XP?

Discussion in 'Windows XP Basics' started by William Lurie, Oct 20, 2010.

  1. VanguardLH wrote:
    > William Lurie wrote:
    >
    >> VanguardLH wrote:
    >>
    >>> William Lurie wrote:
    >>>
    >>>> Maybe this is slightly off topic, but not far.
    >>>> I bought HotFaxMessageCenter years ago and like it a lot.
    >>>> But I made the mistake of switching from DSL to AT&T U-Verse
    >>>> and they (and the software vendor) tell me they can't be made to work
    >>>> together. That's not the only 'feature' I lost by going to a

    system with
    >>>> higher speed (which I did not need).
    >>>>
    >>>> Can someone suggest a FAXing package I can install in XP/Home that

    will
    >>>> work with U-Verse? Thanks.
    >>> When you had DSL, you had both the old POTS lines (for voice) and
    >>> filters to separate the data traffic at higher frequencies. So how did
    >>> going to AT&T U-verse make you lose your phone line (that you can use
    >>> with your analog data/fax modem)? Did you actually choose to terminate
    >>> your telco service and switch over to a digital phone service?

    >> The mechanism is that AT&T ran fiber optics in and it had everything
    >> including TV (which I didn't take). I don't think any of the old copper
    >> that came up to the house is being used, but it's still there and I may
    >> yet make them put me back. I don't know how AT&T gets into the phone
    >> traffic lines.
    >>
    >> I thought the same as you, that 4 KHz of bandwidth is still there and I
    >> should be able to use it the same way.....but the modem "doesn't find
    >> the line". I checked with the Hot Fax software guys and they said "It's
    >> old, we don't make FAX gear any more, and we don't support it". That's
    >> why I'm in the market for software to install which carries a claim that
    >> it works with U-Verse. Last response up was to a supplier who says "Try
    >> it for free for 30 days".
    >>
    >> This is the reply I was unable to send yesterday.

    >
    > Sometimes but not always (and perhaps not even often) the analog
    > data/fax modem will not work with a VOIP (Voice Over IP) service. It is
    > typical to lose fax capabilities when you discard the POTS service and
    > go with VOIP.
    >
    > So you had to discontinue your old POTS service with whomever was your
    > telco and switch over to using VOIP with your new ISP. Of course, you
    > could discontinue the VOIP service and resume the POTS service to get
    > back the fax functionality. Or you could drop using the analog data/fax
    > modem altogether and go with using an online eFax service (some are
    > free, some are paid, and there are security issues with your data going
    > or coming through their service but then fax isn't a secure protocol,
    > anyway, along with anyone seeing your fax at the other end if you
    > connected to the correct other end).
    >
    > Instead of my ISP's (Comcast's) VOIP service, I went with the far
    > cheaper MagicJack VOIP service. My analog data/fax modem won't work
    > with VOIP. Some MJ users say their fax modem works okay but that
    > doesn't help me. So I solved the issue by using online fax services for
    > both sending and receiving faxes. I use GotMyFax or FaxZero to send
    > faxes and a free eFax to receive faxes via e-mail.
    >
    > If you need to use your analog fax/data modem or a fax machine to send
    > or receive your faxes, especially for business use, then you'll have to
    > go back to using the POTS service from your telco or get a 2nd line
    > using POTS (and use the VOIP service as another phone line). If you're
    > doing a lot of faxing, you'll want a dedicated POTS line for your fax
    > modem/machine, anyway, to keep your primary line from getting tied up
    > with faxing (receive or send) and your voice calls from getting picked
    > up by the fax modem/machine (which has your callers hearing the fax
    > tones); else, you'll have to get a fax switch that listens for fax tones
    > and, if present, switches the call to your fax modem/machine and, if
    > not, switches the call to your telephone.
    >
    > Your hardware setup won't let you fax using VOIP. You'll need a POTS
    > line from your telco to fax (unsubscribe from VOIP and resume POTS
    > service or use them both to have separate "phone" lines) or start
    > looking into using online fax services.

    I hope this reply works. Despite the less than charitable comments
    posted by someone, I found it anomalous that I coundn't just hit 'Reply"
    and compose and have it 'Send' I haven't debugged it all the way, but I
    know I can Compose and Send right here, but this message, from 'Reply'
    may not go.

    Anyway, Vang, your analysis is complete and thorough and I believe it is
    entirely correct. I will probably go back to DSL. But here's another
    wrinkle: I have a 4-in-one Lexmark machine. On the same VOIP line, I
    seem to be able to send a FAX. If I can find that reliable, I can go
    that route for FAXing. And thanks a lot!

    I tried sending this as 'Reply'. It wouldn't go. It says I'm not allowed
    to post to micro.p.w.basics. So I'm going to copy and paste it and send
    it as an independent posting with the same subject. I expect some more
    flak, but I do want to thank Vang for the help.
     
    William Lurie, Oct 20, 2010
    #1
    1. Advertisements

  2. William Lurie

    VanguardLH Guest

    William Lurie wrote:

    > Anyway, Vang, your analysis is complete and thorough and I believe it is
    > entirely correct. I will probably go back to DSL. But here's another
    > wrinkle: I have a 4-in-one Lexmark machine. On the same VOIP line, I
    > seem to be able to send a FAX. If I can find that reliable, I can go
    > that route for FAXing. And thanks a lot!


    Whether or not fax will work seems to depend on the device used. Some
    modems (whether as daughtercards or in the motherboard chipset in a
    computer or the modem inside a fax machine) are better at doing fax over
    VOIP than others. That's why you will see some users of analog data/fax
    modems say they can't do fax-over-VOIP but others say it works for them.

    Unless you find the fluff features are really necessary that are
    included with the VOIP telephony service, there's no reason to include
    it unless your ISP is sticking it to you by claiming they will force you
    to use it and also pay for it to also get their Internet service. My
    ISP has VOIP service but it is far more expensive than MagicJack (but on
    the flip side my ISP's VOIP service is more reliable than MagicJack but
    not enough to compensate for the infrequent need to use my cellphone
    when MJ doesn't work). Personally I believe you should never rely
    solely on VOIP as your only telephony service. If you've used broadband
    Internet long enough, you know there are outages. I'm not talking about
    power outages (because a battery is usually included to keep the VOIP
    service alive). I'm talking about the ISP going down which means so
    does your VOIP service. Plus that battery won't last forever whereas
    the telco has to provide their own reliable power with their POTS
    service (on which DSL rides).
     
    VanguardLH, Oct 22, 2010
    #2

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

It takes just 2 minutes to sign up (and it's free!). Just click the sign up button to choose a username and then you can ask your own questions on the forum.
Similar Threads
  1. William B. Lurie

    Built-in FAX software

    William B. Lurie, Oct 22, 2003, in forum: Windows XP Basics
    Replies:
    17
    Views:
    411
    William B. Lurie
    Oct 26, 2003
  2. Lloyd Flood

    Incoming Fax on XP Fax Console

    Lloyd Flood, Dec 8, 2003, in forum: Windows XP Basics
    Replies:
    3
    Views:
    267
    Sharon F
    Dec 8, 2003
  3. William B. Lurie

    XP FAX software, continued

    William B. Lurie, Jan 31, 2004, in forum: Windows XP Basics
    Replies:
    10
    Views:
    377
    Rob Schneider
    Feb 1, 2004
  4. PeterM
    Replies:
    8
    Views:
    196
    Chuck Wilde
    May 25, 2004
  5. John
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    634
Loading...

Share This Page