Re: ACPI FIXVW2 4-20-2011 a regression?

Discussion in 'Processors' started by Jonathan de Boyne Pollard, Apr 24, 2011.

  1. >> /APIC doesn't work at all without /SMP on same line. It is just
    >> ignored without it.
    >>

    > Are you sure of this statement? I thought that /APIC vs /PIC had to do
    > with how interrupts are routed and that /APIC only makes sense on
    > mother boards that support the more up-to-date interrupt handling.
    >

    At its root, it's a design choice that one has to make about what are
    the default and non-default configurations for an operating system. If
    you look at this from a wider perspective than merely OS/2 platform
    drivers, you'll find that although the various combinations are *in
    theory* orthogonal, in practice the choice of one generally dictates the
    choice of another. In Windows NT, for example, not all of the possible
    combinations of ACPI, local APICs, and SMP exist as HALs (e.g.
    HALACPI.DLL v. HALAPIC.DLL v. HALAAPIC.DLL v. HAPMACPI.DLL v.
    HALMPS.DLL). It's essentially a design decision what combinations to
    support, with what defaults, and when to say "If you don't have X then
    you're just going to have to do without Y as well.". What Allan is
    saying is that the design choice made here is that if you, the system
    administrator, choose the ACPI platform driver, then you get APIC and
    SMP as a job lot: either you have both or you get neither.
     
    Jonathan de Boyne Pollard, Apr 24, 2011
    #1
    1. Advertisements

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

It takes just 2 minutes to sign up (and it's free!). Just click the sign up button to choose a username and then you can ask your own questions on the forum.
Similar Threads
  1. Yousuf Khan

    ACPI 2.0 power supply?

    Yousuf Khan, Aug 18, 2007, in forum: Processors
    Replies:
    3
    Views:
    881
    daytripper
    Aug 19, 2007
  2. Replies:
    0
    Views:
    1,787
Loading...

Share This Page