other spyware clean-up applications (Spybot and Ad-aware)

C

Carl

Is it necessary to still run other spyware clean-up
applications such as Spybot and Ad-aware if you run
Microsoft Spyware application daily. Is this overkill?
It appears that Microsoft's is much more thorough.
Thanks!
 
L

Larry

The point I wish to make is that all of these programs are
based on the same philosophy. It is simply an adaptation
of what anti-virus software has evolved into, a huge
database of all known malicious programs and every change
each malicious program makes to your computer. Those that
are not in the database are not corrected, and these
databases are ALWAYS behind the curve. There are always
new infections that have not yet been included in their
databases.

There is a much simpler, a much more effective, approach
to repairing this type of damage. It is the exact same
method that Microsoft stresses in its computer
administration training and that all administrators depend
on as their main line of defense against system damage
from ANY source - BACKUP AND RESTORE.

Every administrator I know would immediately restore a
critical server from a backup in order to recover from an
infection of malicious code, because it doesn't require a
database of tens of thousands of signatures to find the
problem. It restores the machine to a known good state.
PERIOD.

The reason backup and restore hasn't been widely used on
non-server computers is the additional software, hardware,
and knowledge required. However, starting with Windows
2000, the built-in backup utility will output to a file,
eliminating the need for a tape drive and expensive backup
software.

The complexity of backup and restore can be addressed by
automating the process. One program that does that and is
tailored to backups that will recover a computer from
spyware/virus infections is TheCleanMachine. It is a free
program available at www.techaidsw.com.
 
G

Guest

According to my limited experience, each one picks up
something the others miss. None of them is totally
effective in removing or fixing problems they find, they
tell you "Yes, fixed that!", but next scan - the problem
turns up just the same again.
I've got four of 'em and not long downloaded another to
try. I don't know whether commercial products give you
much advantage over freeware or not. I have Spybot and Ad-
aware as well, both seem to be generally well regarded,
but I wonder if Microsoft likes Spybot telling me that
Internet Explorer still has a hole in it, after all these
years.
 
D

dd

However, starting with Windows 2000, the built-in
I've been using Windows 2000 since it was in Beta and
XP since day 1 and I've never seen a built-in backup
utility. I've gone to the trouble of buying one for that very
reason. Where on earth have they hidden it?

~dd
 
D

dd

Interesting strategy by MS there. Strange indeed. If I wasn't
very happy with my backup software I'd try that out :)

~dd
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Top