confusion regarding 'Installing Executables to to Global Assembly Cache'

[archana]

Hi all,

I read some where that in 2003 you could not able to install
application assemblies in GAC.In Visual Studio 2005 you can even add
application assemblies to the GAC .You can install Exe to GAC.

But i tried with creating small console application and set strong
name to it. When i install it to gac its getting installed in gac.
Then why is it said that we can't do this?

Means am i doing some thing wrong in 2003. Or i misinterpreted the
meaning of this statment.

Please correct me if i am worng.

thanks in advance.

 

[Michael Nemtsev]

Hello archana,

Where did you find that statement?

---
WBR, Michael Nemtsev [.NET/C# MVP].
My blog: http://spaces.live.com/laflour
Team blog: http://devkids.blogspot.com/

"The greatest danger for most of us is not that our aim is too high and we
miss it, but that it is too low and we reach it" (c) Michelangelo

a> Hi all,
a>
a> I read some where that in 2003 you could not able to install
a> application assemblies in GAC.In Visual Studio 2005 you can even add
a> application assemblies to the GAC .You can install Exe to GAC.
a>
a> But i tried with creating small console application and set strong
a> name to it. When i install it to gac its getting installed in gac.
a> Then why is it said that we can't do this?
a>
a> Means am i doing some thing wrong in 2003. Or i misinterpreted the
a> meaning of this statment.
a>
a> Please correct me if i am worng.
a>
a> thanks in advance.
a>

 

[Ignacio Machin \( .NET/ C# MVP \)]

Hi,

Could you rephrase your post, it;s not very clear what your question is.

 

[archana]

Hi,

I refered following link

http://www.c-sharpcorner.com/Upload...rticleID=69edb807-8118-4933-8366-773e87ee80ad

here second point i am not getting.

Can anyone elaborate it for me.

thanks