PC Review


Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread

XP Pro doesn't need to buy terminal services client license...?

 
 
SammyBar
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      10th Sep 2005
Hi all,
I found my problem posted 2 days ago (Win98 pc stopped to connect to W2K
terminal server; network error...) to be a licensing problem. The client is
Win98. I was re-reading W2K terminal services licensing FAQ and... I
understand less than the last time I read this stuff about 2-3 years ago.
The only I can catch for sure is that the W2K Pro and XP Pro DOES NOT NEED
terminal services client licenses. I have checked my licensing server and
I've not found any of my XP Pro workstations listed so I suppouse that is
true. All the PC listed are Win98 and they all have licenses expiring in the
next two months.
I'd like to get this for sure 'cause the Terminal Services connectivity has
become critical for our offices, and we are considering buying more
licenses. But we are also upgrading our PCs to XP Pro so I assume we don't
need to buy new licenses, just upgrading to XP will be enought. Is it?

Thanks in advance
Sammy


 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Vera Noest [MVP]
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      15th Sep 2005
Yes, that's correct.
W2K Pro and XP Pro clients receive a free TS CAL from the built-in
pool of licenses on the TS Licensing Server.
So you still need an activated TS Licensing Server, but you don't
have to buy TS CALs for these clients.
Note that the above only applies if your TS runs W2K. Should you
update your TS to 2003, then you must buy a TS CAL for *all*
clients.

_________________________________________________________
Vera Noest
MCSE, CCEA, Microsoft MVP - Terminal Server
TS troubleshooting: http://ts.veranoest.net
___ please respond in newsgroup, NOT by private email ___

"SammyBar" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote on 10 sep 2005 in
microsoft.public.win2000.termserv.clients:

> Hi all,
> I found my problem posted 2 days ago (Win98 pc stopped to
> connect to W2K terminal server; network error...) to be a
> licensing problem. The client is Win98. I was re-reading W2K
> terminal services licensing FAQ and... I understand less than
> the last time I read this stuff about 2-3 years ago. The only I
> can catch for sure is that the W2K Pro and XP Pro DOES NOT NEED
> terminal services client licenses. I have checked my licensing
> server and I've not found any of my XP Pro workstations listed
> so I suppouse that is true. All the PC listed are Win98 and they
> all have licenses expiring in the next two months.
> I'd like to get this for sure 'cause the Terminal Services
> connectivity has become critical for our offices, and we are
> considering buying more licenses. But we are also upgrading our
> PCs to XP Pro so I assume we don't need to buy new licenses,
> just upgrading to XP will be enought. Is it?
>
> Thanks in advance
> Sammy

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mapping my Terminal Services User Profile to my Terminal Services Home Folder neil.harvey@hen.invesco.com Microsoft Windows 2000 Group Policy 0 20th Apr 2007 11:41 AM
remote desktop client vs terminal services client =?Utf-8?B?TmluYQ==?= Microsoft Windows 2000 1 16th Dec 2005 11:37 PM
Terminal Services Clients Consume Multiple Terminal Services CALs =?Utf-8?B?Y2JsYWNr?= Microsoft Windows 2000 Terminal Server Clients 0 27th Apr 2005 11:24 PM
Thin Client - Windows Terminal Services Client Günter Wirth Windows XP Embedded 1 14th Jul 2004 06:25 PM
Terminal Services Vs. Client Services TSvCS Microsoft Windows 2000 Setup 1 14th Nov 2003 08:16 PM


Features
 

Advertising
 

Newsgroups
 


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:11 AM.