Does anyone know if there is any performance difference between a
standard Xeon and their new low voltage counterparts running at the
same clock-speed?

So in other words (referring to
http://support.intel.com/support/pro.../CS-009348.htm) if I
took a system with:

3.0 GHz LV (low voltage) (PGA package/604 pins/90nm/2MB L2 cache/800
MHz Bus/supports uni and dual processing)

and a system with:

3.0 GHz (PGA package/604 pins/90nm/2MB L2 cache/800 MHz Bus/supports
uni and dual processing)

Would they basically have the same performance?

Cheers,
Andy.

Given the same Mhz, and the same cache size, they should be equivalent
performance.

Yousuf Khan

Yes, I know the obvious answer is that they *should* be equivalent, but
does anyone know if they *defintely* are?

Cheers,
Andy.

feste97 wrote:

> Does anyone know if there is any performance difference between a
> standard Xeon and their new low voltage counterparts running at the
> same clock-speed?
>
> So in other words (referring to
> http://support.intel.com/support/pro.../CS-009348.htm) if I
> took a system with:
>
> 3.0 GHz LV (low voltage) (PGA package/604 pins/90nm/2MB L2 cache/800
> MHz Bus/supports uni and dual processing)
>
> and a system with:
>
> 3.0 GHz (PGA package/604 pins/90nm/2MB L2 cache/800 MHz Bus/supports
> uni and dual processing)
>
> Would they basically have the same performance?

Yes, they have the same performance.

Benjamin