PC Review


Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread

"Wondering" sock-puppets - Mjølnër <miolner@warezfaq.com> GOOFS!!

 
 
Concerned Usenetizen
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      5th Aug 2006
The substance of the article is to provide unwavering proof that the WeBFAQ
Author Mjølnër does use sock puppets to support himself.

What you will witness is Mjølnër make assorted denails. these denails should
be taken as an escape of accountability once it is proven without a doubt that
Mjølnër does in fact sock puppet.

We begin with his denails and reverse accusations. A reverse accusation is to
hurl back the same accusation at your opponent similar to the "I'm rubber
you're glue" routine that children use in elementary school.


From: Mjølnër <(E-Mail Removed)>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d,alt.argus
Subject: Re: THE APOSTLE DROP KICKS WEBFAQ AUTHOR MJOLNER INTO SUBMISSION
Message-ID: <(E-Mail Removed)>

ROFL! I don't ever sock-puppet and you can't prove I ever have.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: Mjolner <(E-Mail Removed)>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d
Message-ID: <(E-Mail Removed)>
Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2004 06:05:25 GMT

In <(E-Mail Removed)>, on Sat, 6 Nov 2004
00:34:57 -0500, TheApostle <likes-to-****@mailme.org> wrote:

>You're an idiot. You sit here and claim you're beating me up with you
>reposted lines use of sock puppets and the aid of John to fight your
>battles when all you've doing is spewing a load of nonsense and your
>delusional beliefs.


Ah, I've already told you that I don't use sock-puppets, but you do.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: Mjolner <(E-Mail Removed)>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d..,alt.2600.warez
Subject: Re: Meet "Moander", The Newest K00Ky Sockpuppet of "Mjulner"
Message-ID: <(E-Mail Removed)>

I don't use sock puppets, which means you're delusional, or lying.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: Mjolner <(E-Mail Removed)>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d
Subject: Re: WarezFAQ Maintainer Mjolner threatens "(e)"
Message-ID: <(E-Mail Removed)>

You are too stupid to know the meaning of the term "sock- puppet".
Everyone else here knows what it means but you do not.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: Mjølnër <(E-Mail Removed)>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d
Subject: Re: Mjølnër "esteemed" WarezFAQ author admits to ....
Message-ID: <(E-Mail Removed)>

>are. You have accused anyone who has flamed you behind a remailer of
>being me with no proof at all. You're own posting style gives you away
>every damn time


That's absurd, some of the people behind remailers, like "ashcroft" are
obviously not you, others are you. The point is that virtually ALL the
remailer sock-puppets that pop up do so to support akula or you, and none
of them support me. To a sane person, that would be conclusive proof that
I don't use sock-puppets to support myself.

I post binaries, but not under the nym Mjølnër- so do you, not under the
nym you're using now. So what? I don't post as sock-puppets supporting
myself the way your kamp does.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

NOTE: Unmistakably the group has seen UFF sock-puppets supporting Mjølnër however
the identification of which WeBFAQ person who is responsible for posting under the
sock-puppet is hard to determine without further postings and evidence.

However, to identify Mjølnër's sock puppets take no effort at all when you have
conclusive proof and Mjølnër's own mis-statements and foolish admissions.

So first I will begin to show conclusive proof.
--------------------------
FACT 1 -
--------------------------

Path: [.]usenetserver.com.POSTED!218abe4d!not-for-mail
From: Wondering <(E-Mail Removed)>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d
Subject: Re: The truth about [...]
Message-ID: <(E-Mail Removed)>
Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 20:08:13 -0400

In <(E-Mail Removed)> on Thu, 27
May 2004 23:27:47 -0000, "(akula)" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>Wondering wrote:
>
>[snip]
>>Are you not Dracula but akula?
>>I think so

>
>You made the statement that John_S posts from Usenetserver.
>Ok - extend me the same benefit of the doubt. I only post


No, I read "Mick" and it was you to.

>With regard to Ms. McChesney and the PGP key, I assert she
>is not the owner of that key and I can prove it by showing
>you all of the text she's ever signed with that key in the
>next line after this sentence.


That is not proof you do not print what she signed to you. Mjolner
has posted real proof and you confessions. All you post is nothing.
Prove them wrong about sharkpost and let them make it from source
as Mjolner said. No silly lies about trojans, keep scumbags in your
own house.

==============================================================

You now have witness a post from someone named "Wondering" supporting
Mjolner. This post was not written in the first person it was written
in the third person context.

How does this post, led you to believe that Mjølnër sock puppets? His own
admissions. Let me beging to take you through them, starting with Hier...

==============================================================

From: Mjolner <(E-Mail Removed)>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d
Subject: Re: WarezFAQ Maintainer Mjolner threatens "(e)"
Message-ID: <(E-Mail Removed)>

I posted only binaries as "Hier". The only text posts made using that
nym were to answer reqs for fills. That's not a sock-puppet, moron.

______________________________________________________________

SOCKPUPPETS EXPOSED!
______________________________________________________________

Path: [....].usenetserver.com.POSTED!218abe4d!not-for-mail <--------------------
From: Hier <(E-Mail Removed)>
Message-ID: <Xns95A8BCF2CA80Bhiernews@63.223.5.251>
User-Agent: Xnews/06.08.25
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 18:34:25 EST
______________________________________________________________

Path: [....].usenetserver.com.POSTED!218abe4d!not-for-mail <--------------------
From: Moander <(E-Mail Removed)>
Newsgroups: alt.argus,alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d,alt.2600.warez
Message-ID: <(E-Mail Removed)>
Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 18:17:08 -0500
______________________________________________________________

Path: [....].usenetserver.com.POSTED!218abe4d!not-for-mail <--------------------
From: Hermes <(E-Mail Removed)>
Message-ID: <Xns95A8BCB8C45DAOlympusNews@63.223.5.251>
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 18:33:05 EST
User-Agent: Xnews/06.08.25
X-Complaints-To: (E-Mail Removed)

______________________________________________________________

Path: [....].usenetserver.com.POSTED!218abe4d!not-for-mail <--------------------
From: Wondering <(E-Mail Removed)>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d
Subject: Re: The truth about [...]
Message-ID: <(E-Mail Removed)>
Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 20:08:13 -0400
______________________________________________________________


 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
KULT KLASSIK: "Any nym that is used by a person to talk with himself is considered a sock-puppet" Concerned Usenetizen Freeware 0 5th Aug 2006 06:08 AM
Re: What do you think of this format for the WAREZFAQ? Mjølnër k00k.on.da.loose@12512.9th.Ave.NW.Seattle.WA.98177 Freeware 0 24th Jun 2006 05:24 AM
Re: lurking sock puppets (was: ...meltdown in progress.) Sholom Aleicham Freeware 0 2nd Jun 2004 05:12 AM
Wondering how the Directory "Pace Anti Piracy" was Placed on my system?!?!?!?!!? David Jones Windows XP General 0 31st Aug 2003 06:38 AM
Re: Wondering how the Directory "Pace Anti Piracy" was Placed on my system?!?!?!?!!? Bite My Bubbles Windows XP Help 0 31st Aug 2003 06:27 AM


Features
 

Advertising
 

Newsgroups
 


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:21 AM.