I guess it depends on whether the OS is running from RAM or flash. More RAM
almost never hurts. I ran with 32MB of RAM and 32MB of flash for quite a
while, in a smaller OS situation (10MB), where the OS was executing directly
from flash.
Paul T
"Chris Tacke, MVP" wrote:
> In my experience I wouldn't think that 32MB of RAM would be enough, given a
> typical image of about 15MB, especially if it's not using XIP. I like to ee
> 64 minimum, and in some cases 128MB helps.
>
> -Chris
>
>
> "Paul G. Tobey [eMVP]" <paultobey _at_ earthlink _dot_ net> wrote in message
> news:6681B699-F0B2-4D65-95B2-(E-Mail Removed)...
> > There are too many variables to answer that. Even your own question has
> > "small" and "a .NET CF application". What do either of those mean? A
> > "small" build might include no UI at all, for example, and might run in a
> > couple of MB of RAM. Or you might mean a build that 'only' includes
> > Internet
> > Explorer, Media Player, and half a dozen other Pro version components of
> > Windows CE. "a .NET CF application" might use SQL CE and take 20MB of
> > RAM,
> > or might run without a UI and take 5MB.
> >
> > The only way to answer the question is to try it for your target build and
> > your target application. I would guess that 32MB of flash and 32MB of RAM
> > on
> > an ARM processor would have most such situations. Of course, a DEBUG
> > build
> > of that same OS might require 64MB of flash...
> >
> > Paul T.
> >
> > "MtheK" wrote:
> >
> >> Hello!
> >>
> >> Has anybody some information about the minimum system requirements for a
> >> small WinCE build running a .NET CF application?
> >>
> >> Especially I didn't find any information about the processor speed (let's
> >> say if i want to use an ARM7 for example), and not very precise
> >> information
> >> about the minimun RAM and ROM usage.
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >> Martin
>
|