Seahawk60B wrote:
> There's obviously something different in the second file that is making
> notepad treat it differently. When you try to paste it in a new text
> file, are you creating the blank file first, or just launching notepad
> with a new, yet-to-be saved file. Does it behave differently if you
> create a new blank .txt file first, then open that (which should be
> ANSI by default), then paste the data into that? What if you copy the
> notepad.exe from the Windows 98 box to the XP box as notepad98.exe or
> such - Will the notepad98.exe open and save it correctly?
Perhaps it's just my machine. I can zip the files and send them to
you. Even in ascii they're only around 2KB to 3KB each. I don't need
to zip them. See how your system reads them, perhaps it's just some
initial setup in WinXP that wasn't done correctly.
send request to
macy
...AT..
california
...DOT..
com
I keep files called $blank.txt lying around so I can cut and paste
tidbits as I run across them. Simply "save as" and it's done. Things
like URLs for special information, historical ongoing emails from
people - so it's all in one place. The beauty of .txt is that when the
change from IE4 went to IE5 went to IE6 didn't matter. All was right
there easy archives, easy retrievals. And much smaller memory.
The paste was into an already existing $blank.txt. [Remember Notepad
originally created this file by editing/deleting the header lines. And
saved the file with no special questions, just standard save]] After
reopening and pasting the file into the existing blank.txt file, that's
when Notepad permanently started mucking the file up. And worse asking
questions, expecting answers, without giving any explanations for what
was going on.
Don't know about copying Notepad98.exe I'm not impressed with WinXP
compared to the performance I get from Win98. I bought XP
Professional, but it's likely to be remanded to the trash heap soon.
XP seems be slower, bloated code. have less control, etc. Sadly, it
seems so much historical code is being used that the CPU probably runs
around duplicating efforts. Not until an OS is built from the ground
up again will that get cleaned up very well.
However, WinXP is forgiving when I run C++ programs during development
that're not quite right and bomb things badly. Only once did WinXP
bomb so badly it unrecoverably changed something - don't know what, so
I had to reinstall. But considering the "damage" the offending program
probably did, that was surprising that's all that happened.
I'm still not sure what advantages I'm supposed to see in XP. Just
not obvious to me. Except I definitely have better presentations due
to ads and pop ups and such. In other words, XP makes me a better
recipient of advertising. But that's not my goal in life. Actually, I
keep tripping over WinXP "improvements". Like this Notepad problem.
and Unicode, etc. [I still haven't sorted out how to organize the open
applications icons to prevent XP from "lumping" them inappropriately]
Many really irksome traits are still there. Like naming folders "My
Documents, My Music, My this, My that and then forcing me to use those
folders first.
Let me know if you'd like to look at the pure text file that causes my
Notepad to go strange. The misread file is around 2KB. The other,
similar, coreectly reading file is around 3KB, slightly larger but
contains the same number of integers, 400, in a single line with single
spaces between.
- Robert -
|