On Sun, 18 Jun 2006 12:04:22 +0200, Don <(E-Mail Removed)>
wrote:
>On Sun, 18 Jun 2006 18:20:41 +1000, Allan <(E-Mail Removed)>
>wrote:
>
>>I have been trying out Vuescan. I scan a lot of books, that are
>>similar to comics - cartoon-type drawings on off-white
>>recycled/newspaper-like paper.
>...
>>Then I thought I'd scan with the HP software to have something to
>>compare with, while fiddling with the Vuescan settings. I instantly
>>get a bright, clear, crisp scan with all white blank areas - on the
>>default HP setting.
>>
>>It's sad really. I hate using the HP software, because I have to
>>reset the settings with every new scan. What a pity Vuescan is far
>>from the hype on the author's site: "higher quality scans than the
>>software that comes with your scanner."
>>
>>Hm... I wish.
>
>At a risk of defending Vuescan but are you sure your HP software isn't
>doing all the editing (i.e. setting the black and white points
>automatically) resulting in pure white background. You should compare
>that to the default Vuescan settings (delete Vuescan.ini and rerun).
Thanks. I deleted the ini file and scans do look better, but I still
can't get the white areas of the page to blank - without washing out
the picture again. I read the author's website and he conveniently
blames the paper. Funny how the HP software hasn't had the same
problem for the last few years and thousands of scans.
>Vuescan doesn't really have a user interface so it's very easy to mess
>things up if you do anything other than use its default settings.
You would think that making white background all white would be one of
the first, most basic of things you would make your scanning software
do... It's as if there's a setting somewhere between "photo" and
"line drawing" that's missing, but needs to be there.
>Of course, Vuescan is also notoriously buggy and unreliable so even
>when you do use correct settings it can (and does) regularly produce
>corrupt output.
It seems to working ok, although I'm using an older version. (8.3.40)
It's just the quality that's the problem. Who wants to either print
ink on 100% of their scan - even in white areas - or, washout the
image with so much white balance to make white actually white, that
you ruin the rest of the image.
I can see how it's probably great for repetitive scanning of text or
photos. Pity there's no middle ground - it would be perfect for me
too! ; )
>>Ah well... Can anyone else suggest a good third-party scanning
>>software?
>
>Essentially the only other alternative is (somewhat pricey) SilverFast
>
> http://www.silverfast.com/
>
>You can download a free trial version but you have to navigate a maze
>in order to get to and download a specific version for your scanner.
>
>Don
Thanks - I'll take a look at that as well.
Allan