DJW <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>On Apr 16, 5:50*pm, "Bob F" <bobnos...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> DJW wrote:
>> > If I use my restore discs I made to get vista back working better will
>> > I need to reinstall the drivers for the chipset and sound card and
>> > video? May I need to reinstall any applications I installed after I
>> > last made a restore disc? And will all my files be safe and there
>> > after I do the restore from the discs I made when I first got the
>> > computer?
>>
>> If you do a repair installation, Your programs will remain. If you just do an
>> installation, they will not work anymore.
>>
>> Drivers and updates may have to be re-installed.
>
>its a 32 bit vista could I get a 64 bit and install that what is the
>difference? and why?
The biggest difference is the ability to use more RAM. A 32-bit OS can
see 4GB of RAM (and can't actually use all of that). 64-bit Vista can
use a lot more, here are the numbers:
Home Basic: 8GB
Home Premium: 16GB
Business, Enterprise, Ultimate: 128GB
(
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/libr...8VS.85%29.aspx)
That allows you to run more programs simultaneously, even RAM-hungry
ones, without using the swap file, and that will make your computer
run faster.
The drawback is that there is no upgrade from a 32-bit to 64-bit
Vista. You have to install the 64-bit version from scratch. And you'll
want to make sure that 64-bit Vista drivers exist for your motherboard
and peripherals before you make the switch.
--
Tim Slattery
(E-Mail Removed)