Hi Grant,
That depends on you as you have several options to cache it. :-)
For example, if you store it within session then it is per user, if you
store it in the cache then it is global.
--
Miha Markic [MVP C#] - RightHand .NET consulting & development
miha at rthand com
www.rthand.com
"GrantMagic" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> ok, thanks
>
> How will that effect multiple users.
> Will they each get their own section in the cache, or will the same cache
> get utilised?
>
>
> "Miha Markic [MVP C#]" <miha at rthand com> wrote in message
> news:%(E-Mail Removed)...
>> Hi,
>>
>> You might cache the datataset you use for binding - you'll skip 3. then.
>> Or, you might manually create a dataset (from modified data) and update
>> it.
>>
>> --
>> Miha Markic [MVP C#] - RightHand .NET consulting & development
>> miha at rthand com
>> www.rthand.com
>>
>> "GrantMagic" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>>>I tend to use the SqlDataAdapter class in WinForms projects because once
>>>the
>>> inital data is loaded any modifications can be easily added/updated
>>> through
>>> a call to the Update() method. I've found in aspnet that the same thing
>>> is
>>> possible but because of the stateless nature of the web in order to do
>>> this
>>> I have to go through the following steps:
>>>
>>> 1. First visit to page loads DataSet and binds DataList with data
>>> 2. User edits data and submits the pages
>>> 3. Reload the DataSet with original data as in 1.
>>> 4. Iterate through the DataList and updates rows in the DataSet
>>> 5. Call the Update() method to update edited rows
>>>
>>> Now am I doing this correctly or is there any way I can skip step 3? It
>>> seems easier to just update each row in the DataList than go through the
>>> process of only updating modified rows.
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
Similar Threads
