Thank you for this explanation Rick,
I read about back end and front end files today, I will take on board
everything you have said and try to work through this.
I will see how I get on in the next couple of days with arranging this
'Front End'.. in the mean time, I appreciate your assistance.
Kind Regards
Tanya
"Rick Brandt" wrote:
> Tanya wrote:
> > Hi Rick
> > Thank you for your suggestions, I am not familiar with permissions in
> > Access - never worried about it, having only had to create basic
> > db's. I have been considering what you have written and realise I
> > have a lot more to learn about permissions. I did a little research
> > today into backing up db's and replica's... This is not going to be
> > as easy as I had hoped.
> > Could you recommend a tutorial on setting this up to work on a
> > network with multiple users?
> > The database when it is completed will be a lot more complex and will
> > sit on a school server, where teachers will be able to access it.
> > Further down the road, I would like students to have limited access
> > to add data.
> > Regards
> > Tanya
>
> I don't know where there are on-line tutorials. There are a lot of Access
> help sites that are easily found with Google though and I'm sure many will
> provide the answers you need.
>
> First off, it is not a good idea to have multiple people simultaneously in
> the same application file (the file containing queries, forms, reports,
> etc.). You want to use a "split" design where there is one file containing
> just tables in a shared folder on the network and multiple copies of another
> file containing everything else. These "front end" files have links to the
> tables in the shared "back end" file and each user installs a local copy of
> one on their own hard drive. While just pointing all users to a single
> monolithic file on the network is technically within the Access
> specifications, real-world experience show that this leads to a lot of file
> corruption problems.
>
> As for security, I don't generally recommend the built in user level
> security that Access provides (no longer supported in the new 2007 file
> format). Most people wanting security fall into two categories. Those
> wanting to provide guidance to cooperative users that are (mostly) ignorant
> of how Access works and those requiring "real" security against users who
> might actually try to do things they shouldn't.
>
> If you need the former then the built in security is overkill in my opinion
> particularly given the fact that it has a steep learning curve. The vast
> majority of people who attempt ULS do it incorrectly. If you need the
> latter then the built in user level security really doesn't pass muster as
> there are utilities easily obtained that can crack it.
>
> --
> Rick Brandt, Microsoft Access MVP
> Email (as appropriate) to...
> RBrandt at Hunter dot com
>
>
>
|