That link was a good read but having done my share of messing around with
multiple boot configurations over the years I'm inclined to disagree with
a couple of points:
* The traditional non-Microsoft way of triple booting by activating the chosen
partition and hiding all others is somewhat restrictive. In every config
I've used (95+3.1, 98+NT, 2K+Linux [with the 2K boot loader], XP+98, Vista+XP)
I've always wanted to access all partitions from any OS even if it means
installed ext2fs drivers for Windows or NTFS drivers for Linux or Win9x.
* My OS's are not entangled. I change the XP partition to active and dump
the Vista partition and XP just works or I can delete the 3 XP files from
the Vista partition and drop the XP partition and Vista just works. This
seems about as straight forward as if I was using a 3rd party boot manager
and wanted to remove an OS. Similarly, writing the correct MBR to a hard
drive after cloning a single Windows partition is trivial.
But the article has some good points too:
* Microsoft should really go with an MBR loader and things would be easier.
I'll hazard a guess that the size of MS's boot code is what prevents this.
* I do need to have a technical understanding of what is going on in order
to get the Microsoft dual-boot working well. I've often used a disk sector
editor to extract a 9x boot sector after repartitioning or installing OSes
in the non-recommended order. When people ask how I've achieved some boot
config they zone out as soon as it's obvious I spent some time on it.
Cheers,
- Jason
> Jason wrote:
>
>> Also, I know that using Vista's boot loader with my arrangement is an
>> officially supported use case, I was merely having difficulty getting
>> the settings right, so there was no reason to consider another boot
>> manager. Remember, my initial question was "Can someone please help
>> me get the Vista boot loader to work with my XP installation?", I did
>> not say "I'm ready to give up on the Vista boot loader, can someone
>> please suggest an alternative?".
>>
> Jason:
>
> Fine, but now that the boot files of the two OS's are entangled you
> will have the same problems as everybody else when removing them or
> reinstalling them.
>
> You might find the following intersting:
>
> "What's Wrong with the Microsoft Way?"
> http://www.goodells.net/multiboot/principles.htm
> David Wilkinson
>