Re: cannot burn cd need help

Dear John, you have a tendency to incite flame wars on this newsgroup...

> ..or is this one of those cases you
> are so famous for....remember...you decided that the number of pixels was
> not
> what Movie Maker declared it was using (and Media Player if I recal) but
> instead it was some fancy set of numbers that conveniently fitted some
> augument
> you were trying to press home when you were corrected some months back.

Oh yes i remember that argument very well... it is particularly interesting
because you now claim that it was me who was corrected in that argument...
lol

But listen would you consider this to be helpful or relevant to the OP in
any way? If you now want to open this argument again please start a new
thread an invite us there.

Thanks.

--
Rehan
www.rehanfx.org - get transitions and effects for Windows MovieMaker



"John Kelly" <not.released@dot.com> wrote in message
news:ZmV7d.1761$xb.310@text.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
> Sigh!!!
>
>
> On 3-Oct-2004, "Rehan" <someone@somewhere.com> wrote:
>
>> If the original poster actually wants to write a Highmat video disk
>> realizing that it wont run in any standalone dvd player; i agree that
>> your
>> solution is a help in right direction. However this is not completely
>> clear
>> from the original post, although it mentioned that he has applied the
>> Highmat upgrade but did not say that he is aware of its limitations with
>> DVD
>> players.
>
> Shall we leave what the original poster wants down to him, instead of your
> usual second guessing.......
>
> The original poster in this case and many others where negative advice was
> given, is quite clear on what he wants......or is this one of those cases
> you
> are so famous for....remember...you decided that the number of pixels was
> not
> what Movie Maker declared it was using (and Media Player if I recal) but
> instead it was some fancy set of numbers that conveniently fitted some
> augument
> you were trying to press home when you were corrected some months back.
>
> As far as the url you provide goes, it may be valid, but, having seen
> others
> from you that had no connection to the subject under discussion, I will
> not be
> visiting it......
>
> The original poster wants some help, I offered and you tried to belittle
> it
> (yet again) My advice was to give something a try, yours was negative
> advice.....
>
> Try helping instead of telling people who have asked a question that they
> cannot do what you "guess" they really meant
>
> --
> John Kelly

On 3-Oct-2004, "Rehan" <someone@somewhere.com> wrote:

> Dear John, you have a tendency to incite flame wars on this newsgroup...

Ha !!! Wow, isn't that what I said to you ages back ???


> Oh yes i remember that argument very well... it is particularly interesting
> because you now claim that it was me who was corrected in that argument...
> lol

LOL ???? Yes I do, but not only do I claim it, I can prove it...In fact a
whole section of my website was created just because of your continued stupid
remarks along the lines of....I don't think Movie Maker does do a size x size
(even though it says it does)....I think it actually does Mywhim of the moment
by another whim of the moment....lets do a test and lets do another test, lets
not believe what Media Player says the size by size is....I think its this by
this (In a desperate attempt to prove a point that every one else was having a
good laugh at).......would you like me to dig out the word for word remarks you
made ????? Why were you laughing ??? or was it a nervous laugh???

> But listen would you consider this to be helpful or relevant to the OP in
> any way? If you now want to open this argument again please start a new
> thread an invite us there.

I did not think your remarks were at all helpfull to the OP I am still
wondering why you did it.

As we now know, my remarks were relevant (I just answered the question as it
was presented by the OP)

It was you with your usually belittling remarks working on a play of my words
"Fix-It" that you used when you again started a flame war, in this thread,
telling in your often used negative way that a certain thing cannot be
achieved...remember??? you had decided that the original poster was doing a
certain thing (which was wrong) and then wove a story around it so as to make
yourself look good. You started it...not me. You were wrong with those remarks,
as usual....pity the less informed who have to come for help are exposed to
such an opinionated person as your self.....should I remind you of the little
event only a few days back when you were making it up as you went....telling a
novice how Windows created a program entry in the registry in a certain
position....It was a total load of rubbish with no foundation in the real world
at all and if you had not been corrected at least one novice would have
believed everything you said....should I mention these URL's that you like to
throw around....I can't remember the exact subject (but it will be easy to
find) When you were again corrected you bring in a URL that you claimed
supported your argument...I went and had a look at it just in case you had for
once found a URL that did prove your arguments...and I was right again....not
only did the URL not prove your point, it was not even connected to the subject
at hand.!!!!!

It seems then, rehan, if someone dares to correct you then that is considered
by you to be the start of a flame war (I know someone else who behaves that
way...52 !!!)....interesting view you have on life. If that is how you want it
then I guess we are in for a few of your flame wars...because if you do spin a
story again about how something works ( making it up as you go along ) you can
expect me to correct you, and if you do decide to invent a scenario that does
not exist in order to support stupid remarks you can expect me to correct you
there as well.

Thank you for confirming that this is another of your flame wars by the way.

--
John Kelly
www.the-kellys.org
www.the-kellys.co.uk
\|||/
(o o)
----------ooO-(_)-Ooo-------------
All material gained from other sources is duly acknowledged. No Value is
obtained by publishing in any format other peoples work

"John Kelly" <not.released@dot.com> wrote in message
news:j3b8d.203439$hZ3.181127@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk...


[... massive snip of gibbrish ...]

As I said it is all irrelevant to this thread. Please start a new thread.
Btw its good to see you in action again. This gives me comfort that you are
feeling well enough.

--
Rehan
www.rehanfx.org - get more effects and transitions for movie maker





"John Kelly" <not.released@dot.com> wrote in message
news:j3b8d.203439$hZ3.181127@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
>
> On 3-Oct-2004, "Rehan" <someone@somewhere.com> wrote:
>
>> Dear John, you have a tendency to incite flame wars on this newsgroup...
>
> Ha !!! Wow, isn't that what I said to you ages back ???
>
>
>> Oh yes i remember that argument very well... it is particularly
>> interesting
>> because you now claim that it was me who was corrected in that
>> argument...
>> lol
>
> LOL ???? Yes I do, but not only do I claim it, I can prove it...In fact
> a
> whole section of my website was created just because of your continued
> stupid
> remarks along the lines of....I don't think Movie Maker does do a size x
> size
> (even though it says it does)....I think it actually does Mywhim of the
> moment
> by another whim of the moment....lets do a test and lets do another test,
> lets
> not believe what Media Player says the size by size is....I think its this
> by
> this (In a desperate attempt to prove a point that every one else was
> having a
> good laugh at).......would you like me to dig out the word for word
> remarks you
> made ????? Why were you laughing ??? or was it a nervous laugh???
>
>> But listen would you consider this to be helpful or relevant to the OP in
>> any way? If you now want to open this argument again please start a new
>> thread an invite us there.
>
> I did not think your remarks were at all helpfull to the OP I am still
> wondering why you did it.
>
> As we now know, my remarks were relevant (I just answered the question as
> it
> was presented by the OP)
>
> It was you with your usually belittling remarks working on a play of my
> words
> "Fix-It" that you used when you again started a flame war, in this thread,
> telling in your often used negative way that a certain thing cannot be
> achieved...remember??? you had decided that the original poster was doing
> a
> certain thing (which was wrong) and then wove a story around it so as to
> make
> yourself look good. You started it...not me. You were wrong with those
> remarks,
> as usual....pity the less informed who have to come for help are exposed
> to
> such an opinionated person as your self.....should I remind you of the
> little
> event only a few days back when you were making it up as you
> went....telling a
> novice how Windows created a program entry in the registry in a certain
> position....It was a total load of rubbish with no foundation in the real
> world
> at all and if you had not been corrected at least one novice would have
> believed everything you said....should I mention these URL's that you like
> to
> throw around....I can't remember the exact subject (but it will be easy to
> find) When you were again corrected you bring in a URL that you claimed
> supported your argument...I went and had a look at it just in case you had
> for
> once found a URL that did prove your arguments...and I was right
> again....not
> only did the URL not prove your point, it was not even connected to the
> subject
> at hand.!!!!!
>
> It seems then, rehan, if someone dares to correct you then that is
> considered
> by you to be the start of a flame war (I know someone else who behaves
> that
> way...52 !!!)....interesting view you have on life. If that is how you
> want it
> then I guess we are in for a few of your flame wars...because if you do
> spin a
> story again about how something works ( making it up as you go along ) you
> can
> expect me to correct you, and if you do decide to invent a scenario that
> does
> not exist in order to support stupid remarks you can expect me to correct
> you
> there as well.
>
> Thank you for confirming that this is another of your flame wars by the
> way.
>
> --
> John Kelly
> www.the-kellys.org
> www.the-kellys.co.uk
> \|||/
> (o o)
> ----------ooO-(_)-Ooo-------------
> All material gained from other sources is duly acknowledged. No Value is
> obtained by publishing in any format other peoples work

well still not the solution to my problem
by the way i will start a new thread
becuasewhy not


"Rehan" wrote:

> "John Kelly" <not.released@dot.com> wrote in message
> news:j3b8d.203439$hZ3.181127@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
>
>
> [... massive snip of gibbrish ...]
>
> As I said it is all irrelevant to this thread. Please start a new thread.
> Btw its good to see you in action again. This gives me comfort that you are
> feeling well enough.
>
> --
> Rehan
> www.rehanfx.org - get more effects and transitions for movie maker
>
>
>
>
>
> "John Kelly" <not.released@dot.com> wrote in message
> news:j3b8d.203439$hZ3.181127@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
> >
> > On 3-Oct-2004, "Rehan" <someone@somewhere.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Dear John, you have a tendency to incite flame wars on this newsgroup...
> >
> > Ha !!! Wow, isn't that what I said to you ages back ???
> >
> >
> >> Oh yes i remember that argument very well... it is particularly
> >> interesting
> >> because you now claim that it was me who was corrected in that
> >> argument...
> >> lol
> >
> > LOL ???? Yes I do, but not only do I claim it, I can prove it...In fact
> > a
> > whole section of my website was created just because of your continued
> > stupid
> > remarks along the lines of....I don't think Movie Maker does do a size x
> > size
> > (even though it says it does)....I think it actually does Mywhim of the
> > moment
> > by another whim of the moment....lets do a test and lets do another test,
> > lets
> > not believe what Media Player says the size by size is....I think its this
> > by
> > this (In a desperate attempt to prove a point that every one else was
> > having a
> > good laugh at).......would you like me to dig out the word for word
> > remarks you
> > made ????? Why were you laughing ??? or was it a nervous laugh???
> >
> >> But listen would you consider this to be helpful or relevant to the OP in
> >> any way? If you now want to open this argument again please start a new
> >> thread an invite us there.
> >
> > I did not think your remarks were at all helpfull to the OP I am still
> > wondering why you did it.
> >
> > As we now know, my remarks were relevant (I just answered the question as
> > it
> > was presented by the OP)
> >
> > It was you with your usually belittling remarks working on a play of my
> > words
> > "Fix-It" that you used when you again started a flame war, in this thread,
> > telling in your often used negative way that a certain thing cannot be
> > achieved...remember??? you had decided that the original poster was doing
> > a
> > certain thing (which was wrong) and then wove a story around it so as to
> > make
> > yourself look good. You started it...not me. You were wrong with those
> > remarks,
> > as usual....pity the less informed who have to come for help are exposed
> > to
> > such an opinionated person as your self.....should I remind you of the
> > little
> > event only a few days back when you were making it up as you
> > went....telling a
> > novice how Windows created a program entry in the registry in a certain
> > position....It was a total load of rubbish with no foundation in the real
> > world
> > at all and if you had not been corrected at least one novice would have
> > believed everything you said....should I mention these URL's that you like
> > to
> > throw around....I can't remember the exact subject (but it will be easy to
> > find) When you were again corrected you bring in a URL that you claimed
> > supported your argument...I went and had a look at it just in case you had
> > for
> > once found a URL that did prove your arguments...and I was right
> > again....not
> > only did the URL not prove your point, it was not even connected to the
> > subject
> > at hand.!!!!!
> >
> > It seems then, rehan, if someone dares to correct you then that is
> > considered
> > by you to be the start of a flame war (I know someone else who behaves
> > that
> > way...52 !!!)....interesting view you have on life. If that is how you
> > want it
> > then I guess we are in for a few of your flame wars...because if you do
> > spin a
> > story again about how something works ( making it up as you go along ) you
> > can
> > expect me to correct you, and if you do decide to invent a scenario that
> > does
> > not exist in order to support stupid remarks you can expect me to correct
> > you
> > there as well.
> >
> > Thank you for confirming that this is another of your flame wars by the
> > way.
> >
> > --
> > John Kelly
> > www.the-kellys.org
> > www.the-kellys.co.uk
> > \|||/
> > (o o)
> > ----------ooO-(_)-Ooo-------------
> > All material gained from other sources is duly acknowledged. No Value is
> > obtained by publishing in any format other peoples work
>
>
>

Yes, you made a good decision there Cees. Maybe rehan will stop telling you
what you want and stop implying that you are lying by demanding proof of what
you say. Sorry you had to get embroiled with such a person...he's just been told
he is wrong by a Microsoft person as well on another subject (Size of still
images for 16:9 ratio video's).

--
Best Wishes.....John Kelly
www.the-kellys.org
www.the-kellys.co.uk
\|||/
(o o)
----------ooO-(_)-Ooo-------------
All material gained from other sources is duly acknowledged. No Value is
obtained by publishing in any format other peoples work

On 4-Oct-2004, "Rehan" <rehan@nospamntlworld.com> wrote:

> [... massive snip of gibbrish ...]

Yes, the saying "The truth hurts" seems to apply. Its spelt gibberish

> As I said it is all irrelevant to this thread. Please start a new thread.
> Btw its good to see you in action again. This gives me comfort that you are
> feeling well enough.

There you go again, telling people what to do. As far as my health goes, well
simply its none of your business and its not relevant either. As far as giving
comfort goes, is there a name for what's wrong with you? Why would you feel the
need to post irrelevant stuff in here...I can also post irrelevant stuff...the
greatest number/concentration of registered pedophiles in Europe live in
Croydon, UK Would not want to live there, or any where near it, would you?
Makes you wonder how many there are in Croydon that have not yet been brought
to justice !!!! That's about as relevant as your remarks about my health I
should say, it certainly was not personal, was it? and other people would not
want to know or care, would they, so how do you feel that you were justified in
posting that irrelevant information...Hmm mm

--
Best Wishes.....John Kelly
www.the-kellys.org
www.the-kellys.co.uk

Just glad I don't live in Croydon
\|||/
(o o)
----------ooO-(_)-Ooo-------------
All material gained from other sources is duly acknowledged. No Value is
obtained by publishing in any format other peoples work

Cees you do not need to start another thread if you want to discuss the
current issue further.

Can you please also clarify if your problem is only within Movie Maker.
Particularly can you burn using Windows Explorer's CD burnning support? Does
inserting a blank disk bring up the blank disk wizard ?

If the problem is only within Movie Maker you should be able to make a
Highmat Video disk using Windows Explorer's support. Just follow the
instructions at www.highmat.com/howtouseit/demo_wiz.asp to make "Digital
Music and Photos" CD using "HighMAT Extension for Windows XP CD Writing
Wizard".

Although they dont mention it in that tutorial I was able to use my WMV
videos as well as other media (jpgs and wmas) to make a highmat disk which
played fine in the viewer that comes from their website
www.highmat.com/download

Hope it helps.

--
Rehan
www.rehanfx.org - get more effects and transitions for movie maker





"cees beers" <ceesbeers@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:05CF5B46-4F66-449C-AC98-8CB58CF63552@microsoft.com...
> well still not the solution to my problem
> by the way i will start a new thread
> becuasewhy not
>
>
> "Rehan" wrote:
>
>> "John Kelly" <not.released@dot.com> wrote in message
>> news:j3b8d.203439$hZ3.181127@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
>>
>>
>> [... massive snip of gibbrish ...]
>>
>> As I said it is all irrelevant to this thread. Please start a new thread.
>> Btw its good to see you in action again. This gives me comfort that you
>> are
>> feeling well enough.
>>
>> --
>> Rehan
>> www.rehanfx.org - get more effects and transitions for movie maker
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> "John Kelly" <not.released@dot.com> wrote in message
>> news:j3b8d.203439$hZ3.181127@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
>> >
>> > On 3-Oct-2004, "Rehan" <someone@somewhere.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Dear John, you have a tendency to incite flame wars on this
>> >> newsgroup...
>> >
>> > Ha !!! Wow, isn't that what I said to you ages back ???
>> >
>> >
>> >> Oh yes i remember that argument very well... it is particularly
>> >> interesting
>> >> because you now claim that it was me who was corrected in that
>> >> argument...
>> >> lol
>> >
>> > LOL ???? Yes I do, but not only do I claim it, I can prove it...In
>> > fact
>> > a
>> > whole section of my website was created just because of your continued
>> > stupid
>> > remarks along the lines of....I don't think Movie Maker does do a size
>> > x
>> > size
>> > (even though it says it does)....I think it actually does Mywhim of the
>> > moment
>> > by another whim of the moment....lets do a test and lets do another
>> > test,
>> > lets
>> > not believe what Media Player says the size by size is....I think its
>> > this
>> > by
>> > this (In a desperate attempt to prove a point that every one else was
>> > having a
>> > good laugh at).......would you like me to dig out the word for word
>> > remarks you
>> > made ????? Why were you laughing ??? or was it a nervous laugh???
>> >
>> >> But listen would you consider this to be helpful or relevant to the OP
>> >> in
>> >> any way? If you now want to open this argument again please start a
>> >> new
>> >> thread an invite us there.
>> >
>> > I did not think your remarks were at all helpfull to the OP I am still
>> > wondering why you did it.
>> >
>> > As we now know, my remarks were relevant (I just answered the question
>> > as
>> > it
>> > was presented by the OP)
>> >
>> > It was you with your usually belittling remarks working on a play of my
>> > words
>> > "Fix-It" that you used when you again started a flame war, in this
>> > thread,
>> > telling in your often used negative way that a certain thing cannot be
>> > achieved...remember??? you had decided that the original poster was
>> > doing
>> > a
>> > certain thing (which was wrong) and then wove a story around it so as
>> > to
>> > make
>> > yourself look good. You started it...not me. You were wrong with those
>> > remarks,
>> > as usual....pity the less informed who have to come for help are
>> > exposed
>> > to
>> > such an opinionated person as your self.....should I remind you of the
>> > little
>> > event only a few days back when you were making it up as you
>> > went....telling a
>> > novice how Windows created a program entry in the registry in a certain
>> > position....It was a total load of rubbish with no foundation in the
>> > real
>> > world
>> > at all and if you had not been corrected at least one novice would have
>> > believed everything you said....should I mention these URL's that you
>> > like
>> > to
>> > throw around....I can't remember the exact subject (but it will be easy
>> > to
>> > find) When you were again corrected you bring in a URL that you claimed
>> > supported your argument...I went and had a look at it just in case you
>> > had
>> > for
>> > once found a URL that did prove your arguments...and I was right
>> > again....not
>> > only did the URL not prove your point, it was not even connected to the
>> > subject
>> > at hand.!!!!!
>> >
>> > It seems then, rehan, if someone dares to correct you then that is
>> > considered
>> > by you to be the start of a flame war (I know someone else who behaves
>> > that
>> > way...52 !!!)....interesting view you have on life. If that is how you
>> > want it
>> > then I guess we are in for a few of your flame wars...because if you do
>> > spin a
>> > story again about how something works ( making it up as you go along )
>> > you
>> > can
>> > expect me to correct you, and if you do decide to invent a scenario
>> > that
>> > does
>> > not exist in order to support stupid remarks you can expect me to
>> > correct
>> > you
>> > there as well.
>> >
>> > Thank you for confirming that this is another of your flame wars by the
>> > way.
>> >
>> > --
>> > John Kelly
>> > www.the-kellys.org
>> > www.the-kellys.co.uk
>> > \|||/
>> > (o o)
>> > ----------ooO-(_)-Ooo-------------
>> > All material gained from other sources is duly acknowledged. No Value
>> > is
>> > obtained by publishing in any format other peoples work
>>
>>
>>

Hello,

I am in direct communication with Cees.

To answer the questions you are again asking, please read the original few
messages !!! Phew!!!

--
Best Wishes.....John Kelly
www.the-kellys.org
www.the-kellys.co.uk
Just glad I don't live in Croydon, UK
\|||/
(o o)
----------ooO-(_)-Ooo-------------
All material gained from other sources is duly acknowledged. No Value is
obtained by publishing in any format other peoples work