PC Review Forums Newsgroups Windows XP Windows XP Setup Clean Build versus Update Problem

Reply

Clean Build versus Update Problem

 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 05-11-2004, 08:42 PM   #1
=?Utf-8?B?Sm9ja2Vs?=
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Clean Build versus Update Problem


I am evaluating XPSP2 on an enterprise image. In a clean build from original
select media with SP2 slip streamed Diskeeper and Symantec Antivirus refuse
to work. In an updated build applying XPSP2 to an existing image the same
programs work fine.

I cannot identify the root of the problem.

XPSP1 with SP2 added, AD domain membership and applications already in place
and working, Diskeeper 8 and SAV8.0 Corporate with Autoupdate.

XPSP2 clean build, AD domain membership and same SMS wrapped packages
installed. Diskeeper installs but when opening up the MMC console it dies
with a message about not be able to contact the "remote" machine. SAV
installs and appears to work but it will not connect to the corporate update
servers and cannot be forced to do an autoupdate. WF is turned off by
default on the local LAN.

Any ideas? I have searched the forums for both vendors with no good hits.


  Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2004, 09:01 PM   #2
Shenan Stanley
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Clean Build versus Update Problem

Jockel wrote:
> I am evaluating XPSP2 on an enterprise image. In a clean build from
> original select media with SP2 slip streamed Diskeeper and Symantec
> Antivirus refuse to work. In an updated build applying XPSP2 to an
> existing image the same programs work fine.
>
> I cannot identify the root of the problem.
>
> XPSP1 with SP2 added, AD domain membership and applications already
> in place and working, Diskeeper 8 and SAV8.0 Corporate with
> Autoupdate.
>
> XPSP2 clean build, AD domain membership and same SMS wrapped packages
> installed. Diskeeper installs but when opening up the MMC console it
> dies with a message about not be able to contact the "remote"
> machine. SAV installs and appears to work but it will not connect to
> the corporate update servers and cannot be forced to do an
> autoupdate. WF is turned off by default on the local LAN.
>
> Any ideas? I have searched the forums for both vendors with no good
> hits.


So you are installing DisKeeper using an SMS package or clean?

--
<- Shenan ->
--
The information is provided "as is", it is suggested you research for
yourself before you take any advice - you are the one ultimately
responsible for your actions/problems/solutions. Know what you are
getting into before you jump in with both feet.


  Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2004, 09:11 PM   #3
=?Utf-8?B?Sm9ja2Vs?=
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Clean Build versus Update Problem

SMS package. We wrap everything here for enterprise deployment. There are
no problems with the package. It has been in production for a year. Updates
to the packages happen about every six months for configuration purposes.

"Shenan Stanley" wrote:

> Jockel wrote:
> > I am evaluating XPSP2 on an enterprise image. In a clean build from
> > original select media with SP2 slip streamed Diskeeper and Symantec
> > Antivirus refuse to work. In an updated build applying XPSP2 to an
> > existing image the same programs work fine.
> >
> > I cannot identify the root of the problem.
> >
> > XPSP1 with SP2 added, AD domain membership and applications already
> > in place and working, Diskeeper 8 and SAV8.0 Corporate with
> > Autoupdate.
> >
> > XPSP2 clean build, AD domain membership and same SMS wrapped packages
> > installed. Diskeeper installs but when opening up the MMC console it
> > dies with a message about not be able to contact the "remote"
> > machine. SAV installs and appears to work but it will not connect to
> > the corporate update servers and cannot be forced to do an
> > autoupdate. WF is turned off by default on the local LAN.
> >
> > Any ideas? I have searched the forums for both vendors with no good
> > hits.

>
> So you are installing DisKeeper using an SMS package or clean?
>
> --
> <- Shenan ->
> --
> The information is provided "as is", it is suggested you research for
> yourself before you take any advice - you are the one ultimately
> responsible for your actions/problems/solutions. Know what you are
> getting into before you jump in with both feet.
>
>
>

  Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2004, 10:57 PM   #4
Shenan Stanley
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Clean Build versus Update Problem

Jockel wrote:
> SMS package. We wrap everything here for enterprise deployment.
> There are no problems with the package. It has been in production for
> a year. Updates to the packages happen about every six months for
> configuration purposes.



.... and if you install it without using the package?
.... or recreate the package with SP2?

--
<- Shenan ->
--
The information is provided "as is", it is suggested you research for
yourself before you take any advice - you are the one ultimately
responsible for your actions/problems/solutions. Know what you are
getting into before you jump in with both feet.


  Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2004, 12:37 PM   #5
=?Utf-8?B?Sm9ja2Vs?=
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Clean Build versus Update Problem

The original source is usually not available in our environment. I can try
getting the source and installing that.

What do you mean by building the package under XPSP2?

We use MS SMS Installer as our standard packaging program. Are you
suggesting I run the installer on a SP2 machine to build the packages?

"Shenan Stanley" wrote:

> Jockel wrote:
> > SMS package. We wrap everything here for enterprise deployment.
> > There are no problems with the package. It has been in production for
> > a year. Updates to the packages happen about every six months for
> > configuration purposes.

>
>
> .... and if you install it without using the package?
> .... or recreate the package with SP2?
>
> --
> <- Shenan ->
> --
> The information is provided "as is", it is suggested you research for
> yourself before you take any advice - you are the one ultimately
> responsible for your actions/problems/solutions. Know what you are
> getting into before you jump in with both feet.
>
>
>

  Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off