PC Review
Forums
Newsgroups
Windows XP
Windows XP Setup
Clean Build versus Update Problem
Forums
Newsgroups
Windows XP
Windows XP Setup
Clean Build versus Update Problem
![]() |
Clean Build versus Update Problem |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I am evaluating XPSP2 on an enterprise image. In a clean build from original
select media with SP2 slip streamed Diskeeper and Symantec Antivirus refuse to work. In an updated build applying XPSP2 to an existing image the same programs work fine. I cannot identify the root of the problem. XPSP1 with SP2 added, AD domain membership and applications already in place and working, Diskeeper 8 and SAV8.0 Corporate with Autoupdate. XPSP2 clean build, AD domain membership and same SMS wrapped packages installed. Diskeeper installs but when opening up the MMC console it dies with a message about not be able to contact the "remote" machine. SAV installs and appears to work but it will not connect to the corporate update servers and cannot be forced to do an autoupdate. WF is turned off by default on the local LAN. Any ideas? I have searched the forums for both vendors with no good hits. |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Jockel wrote:
> I am evaluating XPSP2 on an enterprise image. In a clean build from > original select media with SP2 slip streamed Diskeeper and Symantec > Antivirus refuse to work. In an updated build applying XPSP2 to an > existing image the same programs work fine. > > I cannot identify the root of the problem. > > XPSP1 with SP2 added, AD domain membership and applications already > in place and working, Diskeeper 8 and SAV8.0 Corporate with > Autoupdate. > > XPSP2 clean build, AD domain membership and same SMS wrapped packages > installed. Diskeeper installs but when opening up the MMC console it > dies with a message about not be able to contact the "remote" > machine. SAV installs and appears to work but it will not connect to > the corporate update servers and cannot be forced to do an > autoupdate. WF is turned off by default on the local LAN. > > Any ideas? I have searched the forums for both vendors with no good > hits. So you are installing DisKeeper using an SMS package or clean? -- <- Shenan -> -- The information is provided "as is", it is suggested you research for yourself before you take any advice - you are the one ultimately responsible for your actions/problems/solutions. Know what you are getting into before you jump in with both feet. |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
SMS package. We wrap everything here for enterprise deployment. There are
no problems with the package. It has been in production for a year. Updates to the packages happen about every six months for configuration purposes. "Shenan Stanley" wrote: > Jockel wrote: > > I am evaluating XPSP2 on an enterprise image. In a clean build from > > original select media with SP2 slip streamed Diskeeper and Symantec > > Antivirus refuse to work. In an updated build applying XPSP2 to an > > existing image the same programs work fine. > > > > I cannot identify the root of the problem. > > > > XPSP1 with SP2 added, AD domain membership and applications already > > in place and working, Diskeeper 8 and SAV8.0 Corporate with > > Autoupdate. > > > > XPSP2 clean build, AD domain membership and same SMS wrapped packages > > installed. Diskeeper installs but when opening up the MMC console it > > dies with a message about not be able to contact the "remote" > > machine. SAV installs and appears to work but it will not connect to > > the corporate update servers and cannot be forced to do an > > autoupdate. WF is turned off by default on the local LAN. > > > > Any ideas? I have searched the forums for both vendors with no good > > hits. > > So you are installing DisKeeper using an SMS package or clean? > > -- > <- Shenan -> > -- > The information is provided "as is", it is suggested you research for > yourself before you take any advice - you are the one ultimately > responsible for your actions/problems/solutions. Know what you are > getting into before you jump in with both feet. > > > |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Jockel wrote:
> SMS package. We wrap everything here for enterprise deployment. > There are no problems with the package. It has been in production for > a year. Updates to the packages happen about every six months for > configuration purposes. .... and if you install it without using the package? .... or recreate the package with SP2? -- <- Shenan -> -- The information is provided "as is", it is suggested you research for yourself before you take any advice - you are the one ultimately responsible for your actions/problems/solutions. Know what you are getting into before you jump in with both feet. |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
The original source is usually not available in our environment. I can try
getting the source and installing that. What do you mean by building the package under XPSP2? We use MS SMS Installer as our standard packaging program. Are you suggesting I run the installer on a SP2 machine to build the packages? "Shenan Stanley" wrote: > Jockel wrote: > > SMS package. We wrap everything here for enterprise deployment. > > There are no problems with the package. It has been in production for > > a year. Updates to the packages happen about every six months for > > configuration purposes. > > > .... and if you install it without using the package? > .... or recreate the package with SP2? > > -- > <- Shenan -> > -- > The information is provided "as is", it is suggested you research for > yourself before you take any advice - you are the one ultimately > responsible for your actions/problems/solutions. Know what you are > getting into before you jump in with both feet. > > > |
|
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|

Main Page 

