PC Review Forums Newsgroups Windows XP Windows XP Setup Why four primary partitions in the nt family

Reply

Why four primary partitions in the nt family

 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 15-06-2004, 07:27 PM   #1
Stephen M Jones
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Why four primary partitions in the nt family


How did Microsoft arrive at the quantity of four for
primary partitions (or three and one extended)? The need
for one is obvious. But why the jump to four?
  Reply With Quote
Old 15-06-2004, 07:35 PM   #2
Will Denny
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Why four primary partitions in the nt family

Hi

The maximum number of Primary partitions is limited to 3 - for the purpose
of dual/triple booting. The one extended partition can then be divided up
into data partitions

--

Will Denny
MS-MVP Windows - Shell/User
Please reply to the News Groups


"Stephen M Jones" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:1cc6f01c45306$68d930f0$a101280a@phx.gbl...
| How did Microsoft arrive at the quantity of four for
| primary partitions (or three and one extended)? The need
| for one is obvious. But why the jump to four?

  Reply With Quote
Old 15-06-2004, 11:57 PM   #3
I'm Dan
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Why four primary partitions in the nt family


"Stephen M Jones" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:
> How did Microsoft arrive at the quantity of four for
> primary partitions (or three and one extended)? The
> need for one is obvious. But why the jump to four?


This has nothing to do with the NT family, and I'm not even sure if it was a
Microsoft decision. I know that the 4-slot partition table was a well
established standard at least as early as DOS 3.0, which is when I began
hacking boot records and partition tables. I recall reading somewhere that
in the early days of hard disks, people would need to multiboot DOS and
CP/M, which at the time had more software apps than Microsoft. Back in
those days there were lots of alternative OS's, and the partition table was
standardized so people could multiboot up to four of them. I believe the
"extended" partition type was an afterthought when it was realized four
might not be enough.



  Reply With Quote
Old 20-06-2004, 03:23 AM   #4
Kent W. England [MVP]
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Why four primary partitions in the nt family

Stephen M Jones wrote:

> How did Microsoft arrive at the quantity of four for
> primary partitions (or three and one extended)? The need
> for one is obvious. But why the jump to four?


The boot sector definition is ancient history, far predating the NT
family of operating systems. The only thing funky about NT/2K/XP is that
you can't boot these OSes from an extended partition, only from a
primary partition. If you want to boot more than four NT-like
partitions, you need a third-party manager like BootItNG that supports
partition hiding. And no matter what the MBR says, NT-like OSes look at
the disk directly and get upset if you slide the partition around (but
they don't stay upset for long).

The new 64 bit Windows OSes have a new boot setup.

--
Kent W. England, Microsoft MVP for Windows Security
  Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off