PC Review
Forums
Newsgroups
Windows XP
Windows XP Setup
Re: why in gods name?
Forums
Newsgroups
Windows XP
Windows XP Setup
Re: why in gods name?
![]() |
Re: why in gods name? |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
> -----Original Message-----
> why in gods name can i be expected to pay 200.00 for both > of my computers in my house for xp pro?!!!! God <> wrote: > God and Microsoft both agreed that you need > a new license for each installation. "god" had nothing to do with it. There are a lot of people who want to "oppose the Licensing practices". You are not alone and a lot of the people who will be responding to you will either be against you or merely explaining what you did previously was against the EULA that came with those products as well and now the product activation helps to enforce the EULA and others will respond to them saying that the EULA doesn't mean anything and still others will respond in a flamatory manner, just letting their emotions get the best of them. The hard facts are that if you read the End User License Agreement you clicked OK or CONTINUE to when you installed the product, the text does tell you that you can install this copy of the software and activate it on only ONE machine. I would suggest reading more up on this at Microsoft's site.. Learn more about the EULA and Windows XP Product Activation: http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/.../activation.asp Order Additional Licenses: Home: http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/...obuy/addlic.asp Pro: http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/...obuy/addlic.asp As for whether or not you have a leg to stand on "fighting the man" -> Depends on how much time, resources, etc you have. It also depends on your own moral code and the laws where you live. In truth, you did agree to the EULA, read it or not, when you installed the OS and especially when you activated the product. Of course, this has always been true (Win95, Win98, WinME, WinNT, Win2000) for the Windows OSs, that installing onto multiple computers with only a single copy(single license) was against the EULA you agreed to when you installed. Just that "XP's Activation" makes it "supposedly" more difficult to get around. I have no opinion to give either way and leave each user to their own decision, as all the information you need exists out on the Internet, in other places in this newsgroup and in print elsewhere. However, with that single registration number, you will not be able to activate the other computers without with-holding information, lying when asked direct questions, or finding 'other means' to install Windows XP onto multiple -- Shenan Stanley "Just trying to help" |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Shenan T. Stanley wrote:
>> -----Original Message----- >> why in gods name can i be expected to pay 200.00 for both >> of my computers in my house for xp pro?!!!! The same reason you were expected to do so for every version of Windows that ever existed. It has /ALWAYS/ been one licence per system only now it's enforced. If you used previous versions on more than one system you were still in breach of the EULA. -- Cassandra Card carrying member of the Fresh Start Club 'The Undead Are People Too!' Reply address is fake. Please send all praise, abuse, insults, bequests of £1million to cassandra (at) craigy34 (dot) freeserve (dot) co (dot) uk. Change the obvious to the obvious. Private requests for assistance will not be acknowledged. Please post all correspondence to the group so that all may benefit. Thank you. |
|
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|

Main Page 

