PC Review
Forums
Newsgroups
Windows XP
Windows XP Hardware
ATA/100 Vs. ATA/133
Forums
Newsgroups
Windows XP
Windows XP Hardware
ATA/100 Vs. ATA/133
![]() |
ATA/100 Vs. ATA/133 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Which would perform better with XP Pro:
An 80 Gigabyte Hard-drive with 8mb Cache and ATA/100 or an 80 Gigabyte Hard drive with 2mb cache and ATA/133? |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
What does your motherboard use for the primary IDE ports???
Y. "Bryan Maier" <XeeXl@fusemail.com> wrote in message news:erAps3f6DHA.2996@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl... > Which would perform better with XP Pro: > An 80 Gigabyte Hard-drive with 8mb Cache and ATA/100 or an 80 Gigabyte Hard > drive with 2mb cache and ATA/133? > > |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Do you mean does his mother board support 100/133..?
You question don't make scene, my mother board uses IDE ports for primary and secondary. "Yves Leclerc" <yvesleclercNOSPAM@sympatico.ca> wrote in message news:etHA85f6DHA.360@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... > What does your motherboard use for the primary IDE ports??? > > Y. > > "Bryan Maier" <XeeXl@fusemail.com> wrote in message > news:erAps3f6DHA.2996@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl... > > Which would perform better with XP Pro: > > An 80 Gigabyte Hard-drive with 8mb Cache and ATA/100 or an 80 Gigabyte > Hard > > drive with 2mb cache and ATA/133? > > > > > > |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
2 meg ata/133
"Bryan Maier" <XeeXl@fusemail.com> wrote in message news:erAps3f6DHA.2996@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl... > Which would perform better with XP Pro: > An 80 Gigabyte Hard-drive with 8mb Cache and ATA/100 or an 80 Gigabyte Hard > drive with 2mb cache and ATA/133? > > |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Forgot to mention - XP Pro with SP1 will support UDMA6
"RonK" <nothere@home.com> wrote in message news:vdETb.2793$ZN1.200855@news20.bellglobal.com... > 2 meg ata/133 > > > "Bryan Maier" <XeeXl@fusemail.com> wrote in message > news:erAps3f6DHA.2996@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl... > > Which would perform better with XP Pro: > > An 80 Gigabyte Hard-drive with 8mb Cache and ATA/100 or an 80 Gigabyte > Hard > > drive with 2mb cache and ATA/133? > > > > > > |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
And, what are the hardware specs of those ports. Yves Leclerc's question was
entirely valid. If the ports are only ATA 100, using an ATA 133 hard drive on them will gain you nothing! Therefore, the ATA 100 drive with 8 meg cache will be the best! -- Regards: Richard Urban aka Crusty (-: Old B@stard :-) "Nick Burns" <thedoc@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:OtYjPEg6DHA.2044@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... > Do you mean does his mother board support 100/133..? > > You question don't make scene, my mother board uses IDE ports for primary > and secondary. > > > "Yves Leclerc" <yvesleclercNOSPAM@sympatico.ca> wrote in message > news:etHA85f6DHA.360@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... > > What does your motherboard use for the primary IDE ports??? > > > > Y. > > > > "Bryan Maier" <XeeXl@fusemail.com> wrote in message > > news:erAps3f6DHA.2996@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl... > > > Which would perform better with XP Pro: > > > An 80 Gigabyte Hard-drive with 8mb Cache and ATA/100 or an 80 Gigabyte > > Hard > > > drive with 2mb cache and ATA/133? > > > > > > > > > > > > |
|
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|

Main Page 

