PC Review Forums Newsgroups Windows XP Windows XP Hardware ATA/100 Vs. ATA/133

Reply

ATA/100 Vs. ATA/133

 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 03-02-2004, 02:31 AM   #1
Bryan Maier
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default ATA/100 Vs. ATA/133


Which would perform better with XP Pro:
An 80 Gigabyte Hard-drive with 8mb Cache and ATA/100 or an 80 Gigabyte Hard
drive with 2mb cache and ATA/133?


  Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2004, 02:36 AM   #2
Yves Leclerc
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: ATA/100 Vs. ATA/133

What does your motherboard use for the primary IDE ports???

Y.

"Bryan Maier" <XeeXl@fusemail.com> wrote in message
news:erAps3f6DHA.2996@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> Which would perform better with XP Pro:
> An 80 Gigabyte Hard-drive with 8mb Cache and ATA/100 or an 80 Gigabyte

Hard
> drive with 2mb cache and ATA/133?
>
>



  Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2004, 02:57 AM   #3
Nick Burns
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: ATA/100 Vs. ATA/133

Do you mean does his mother board support 100/133..?

You question don't make scene, my mother board uses IDE ports for primary
and secondary.


"Yves Leclerc" <yvesleclercNOSPAM@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:etHA85f6DHA.360@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> What does your motherboard use for the primary IDE ports???
>
> Y.
>
> "Bryan Maier" <XeeXl@fusemail.com> wrote in message
> news:erAps3f6DHA.2996@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> > Which would perform better with XP Pro:
> > An 80 Gigabyte Hard-drive with 8mb Cache and ATA/100 or an 80 Gigabyte

> Hard
> > drive with 2mb cache and ATA/133?
> >
> >

>
>



  Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2004, 03:04 AM   #4
RonK
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: ATA/100 Vs. ATA/133

2 meg ata/133


"Bryan Maier" <XeeXl@fusemail.com> wrote in message
news:erAps3f6DHA.2996@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> Which would perform better with XP Pro:
> An 80 Gigabyte Hard-drive with 8mb Cache and ATA/100 or an 80 Gigabyte

Hard
> drive with 2mb cache and ATA/133?
>
>



  Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2004, 03:08 AM   #5
RonK
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: ATA/100 Vs. ATA/133

Forgot to mention - XP Pro with SP1 will support UDMA6


"RonK" <nothere@home.com> wrote in message
news:vdETb.2793$ZN1.200855@news20.bellglobal.com...
> 2 meg ata/133
>
>
> "Bryan Maier" <XeeXl@fusemail.com> wrote in message
> news:erAps3f6DHA.2996@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> > Which would perform better with XP Pro:
> > An 80 Gigabyte Hard-drive with 8mb Cache and ATA/100 or an 80 Gigabyte

> Hard
> > drive with 2mb cache and ATA/133?
> >
> >

>
>



  Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2004, 01:50 PM   #6
Richard Urban
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: ATA/100 Vs. ATA/133

And, what are the hardware specs of those ports. Yves Leclerc's question was
entirely valid. If the ports are only ATA 100, using an ATA 133 hard drive
on them will gain you nothing! Therefore, the ATA 100 drive with 8 meg cache
will be the best!

--
Regards:

Richard Urban

aka Crusty (-: Old B@stard :-)

"Nick Burns" <thedoc@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:OtYjPEg6DHA.2044@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> Do you mean does his mother board support 100/133..?
>
> You question don't make scene, my mother board uses IDE ports for primary
> and secondary.
>
>
> "Yves Leclerc" <yvesleclercNOSPAM@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
> news:etHA85f6DHA.360@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> > What does your motherboard use for the primary IDE ports???
> >
> > Y.
> >
> > "Bryan Maier" <XeeXl@fusemail.com> wrote in message
> > news:erAps3f6DHA.2996@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> > > Which would perform better with XP Pro:
> > > An 80 Gigabyte Hard-drive with 8mb Cache and ATA/100 or an 80 Gigabyte

> > Hard
> > > drive with 2mb cache and ATA/133?
> > >
> > >

> >
> >

>
>



  Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off