PC Review
Forums
Newsgroups
Windows Vista
Windows Vista Installation
Dual Boot - Same Drive 32 & 64-bit
Forums
Newsgroups
Windows Vista
Windows Vista Installation
Dual Boot - Same Drive 32 & 64-bit
![]() |
Dual Boot - Same Drive 32 & 64-bit |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
How about best practices for dual booting a new system with both Vista 32 bit
and Vista 64 bit? I've have requirements on a laptop with a single hard drive to run both versions of Vista. The goal is to have 64bit be the primary and 32 bit be available for applications that have not migrated to 64-bit support yet. Yes, I'll have a 32 bit license and a seperate 64-bit license. I know to partition to 3 logical drives. How big do the OS partitions need to be? What order should I proceed, 32 or 64 first? Does it matter whether I install from DVD or from inside Windows? Finally, any considerations when installing applications such as Office or SQL Server to reduce storage space when I have to install both 32-bit and 64-bit versions (yes, I am aware of licensing purchase of different versions)? -- Best wishes Keith Nicholson |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
You didn't say whether you have full, upgrade or OEM versions. I personally
would use 3 primary partitions, but you need at least 1 for the boot files. Glad to hear you are complying with the various licenses :-) It doesn't matter which version you install first between 64-bit and 32-bit. How do you plan on using your partitions and do you have plans to remove one of the OS's in the future. You will have to install your programs in both systems, sharing the data, but since the default program file and system file names are different I have never tried to use the same program files folder across OS's with different bittness. Just my experiences. "Keith Nicholson" <KeithNicholson@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:2C800700-FB9E-487E-A71E-536FA3B1B606@microsoft.com... > How about best practices for dual booting a new system with both Vista 32 > bit > and Vista 64 bit? > > I've have requirements on a laptop with a single hard drive to run both > versions of Vista. The goal is to have 64bit be the primary and 32 bit be > available for applications that have not migrated to 64-bit support yet. > Yes, I'll have a 32 bit license and a seperate 64-bit license. > > I know to partition to 3 logical drives. How big do the OS partitions > need > to be? What order should I proceed, 32 or 64 first? Does it matter > whether > I install from DVD or from inside Windows? Finally, any considerations > when > installing applications such as Office or SQL Server to reduce storage > space > when I have to install both 32-bit and 64-bit versions (yes, I am aware of > licensing purchase of different versions)? > > > -- > Best wishes > Keith Nicholson |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
John,
So far you have confirmed my thoughts. I'll be using full products to install with the hope that I will not need the 32 bit in 18 months. So with that said, I should probably install the 64bit first so that the boot files are on that partition of the three. -- Best wishes Keith Nicholson "John Barnes" wrote: > You didn't say whether you have full, upgrade or OEM versions. I personally > would use 3 primary partitions, but you need at least 1 for the boot files. > Glad to hear you are complying with the various licenses :-) It doesn't > matter which version you install first between 64-bit and 32-bit. How do you > plan on using your partitions and do you have plans to remove one of the > OS's in the future. You will have to install your programs in both systems, > sharing the data, but since the default program file and system file names > are different I have never tried to use the same program files folder across > OS's with different bittness. Just my experiences. > > "Keith Nicholson" <KeithNicholson@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in > message news:2C800700-FB9E-487E-A71E-536FA3B1B606@microsoft.com... > > How about best practices for dual booting a new system with both Vista 32 > > bit > > and Vista 64 bit? > > > > I've have requirements on a laptop with a single hard drive to run both > > versions of Vista. The goal is to have 64bit be the primary and 32 bit be > > available for applications that have not migrated to 64-bit support yet. > > Yes, I'll have a 32 bit license and a seperate 64-bit license. > > > > I know to partition to 3 logical drives. How big do the OS partitions > > need > > to be? What order should I proceed, 32 or 64 first? Does it matter > > whether > > I install from DVD or from inside Windows? Finally, any considerations > > when > > installing applications such as Office or SQL Server to reduce storage > > space > > when I have to install both 32-bit and 64-bit versions (yes, I am aware of > > licensing purchase of different versions)? > > > > > > -- > > Best wishes > > Keith Nicholson > > |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
The boot files will be on the active primary partition on your drive. If
that is the first partition, then that is where you would want to install Vista64. Regardless of the order installed the boot files go on the system partition. Since I wanted to transition to 64-bit, I replaced the hardware and software that was not compatible with 64-bit over about 6 mos. My biggest adjustment was adjusting to new software and doing some things a different way. After the initial adjustment and making sure any new hardware and software are 64-bit compatible, I am very happy, except I would love a fingerprint reader, but alas, they all seem to be only 32-bit. Good luck. "Keith Nicholson" <KeithNicholson@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:093076C4-CD98-4E22-92AB-95569DDBFDD8@microsoft.com... > John, > > So far you have confirmed my thoughts. I'll be using full products to > install with the hope that I will not need the 32 bit in 18 months. So > with > that said, I should probably install the 64bit first so that the boot > files > are on that partition of the three. > -- > Best wishes > Keith Nicholson > > > "John Barnes" wrote: > >> You didn't say whether you have full, upgrade or OEM versions. I >> personally >> would use 3 primary partitions, but you need at least 1 for the boot >> files. >> Glad to hear you are complying with the various licenses :-) It doesn't >> matter which version you install first between 64-bit and 32-bit. How do >> you >> plan on using your partitions and do you have plans to remove one of the >> OS's in the future. You will have to install your programs in both >> systems, >> sharing the data, but since the default program file and system file >> names >> are different I have never tried to use the same program files folder >> across >> OS's with different bittness. Just my experiences. >> >> "Keith Nicholson" <KeithNicholson@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in >> message news:2C800700-FB9E-487E-A71E-536FA3B1B606@microsoft.com... >> > How about best practices for dual booting a new system with both Vista >> > 32 >> > bit >> > and Vista 64 bit? >> > >> > I've have requirements on a laptop with a single hard drive to run both >> > versions of Vista. The goal is to have 64bit be the primary and 32 bit >> > be >> > available for applications that have not migrated to 64-bit support >> > yet. >> > Yes, I'll have a 32 bit license and a seperate 64-bit license. >> > >> > I know to partition to 3 logical drives. How big do the OS partitions >> > need >> > to be? What order should I proceed, 32 or 64 first? Does it matter >> > whether >> > I install from DVD or from inside Windows? Finally, any considerations >> > when >> > installing applications such as Office or SQL Server to reduce storage >> > space >> > when I have to install both 32-bit and 64-bit versions (yes, I am aware >> > of >> > licensing purchase of different versions)? >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Best wishes >> > Keith Nicholson >> >> |
|
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|

Main Page 

