PC Review
Forums
Newsgroups
Hardware
Computer Hardware
Cable for data transfer?
Forums
Newsgroups
Hardware
Computer Hardware
Cable for data transfer?
![]() |
Cable for data transfer? |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I will need to transfer most of the data on my present ageing PC (XP
Home under SP1) to my new one (XP Pro, SP2). Do I just need to buy a 5 metre USB to USB cable please? -- Terry, East Grinstead, UK |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Mar 10, 12:06 pm, Terry Pinnell
<terrypinDEL...@THESEdial.pipex.com> wrote: > I will need to transfer most of the data on my present ageing PC (XP > Home under SP1) to my new one (XP Pro, SP2). Do I just need to buy a 5 > metre USB to USB cable please? > > -- > Terry, East Grinstead, UK Make your old hard drive a slave in your new box. If it's IDE the old hdd goes in the middle of the IDE ribbon with jumper set at "slave" or "CS" (Cable Select) & new hdd jumper at MS (Master) or CS on the end of the ribbon. Swapping your stuff over then is as usual. Good luck, Terry. |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"Terry Pinnell" <terrypinDELETE@THESEdial.pipex.com> wrote in message
news:329at3paukljave4s6uo23ic789f66mgri@4ax.com... >I will need to transfer most of the data on my present ageing PC (XP > Home under SP1) to my new one (XP Pro, SP2). Do I just need to buy a 5 > metre USB to USB cable please? There are USB "cables" you can buy which are specifically for connecting up two pcs. These aren't a straight cable but have a logical device in the middle. (For example: http://www.misco.co.uk/applications...15704&CatId=912.) Don't be fooled into thinking this is networking your two pcs, it isn't (or at least the usb transfer cable I does doesn't create what XP regards as a network.) Is your old PC on the network, because if it is then copying files via the network would be quicker and easier. Failing that, then go With the suggestion of "sandy58" and take the disk out of your old pc and add it to your new one - just be sure that you don't end up booting from it instead of the disk in your new pc. -- Brian Cryer www.cryer.co.uk/brian |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:06:45 +0000, Terry Pinnell
<terrypinDELETE@THESEdial.pipex.com> wrote: >I will need to transfer most of the data on my present ageing PC (XP >Home under SP1) to my new one (XP Pro, SP2). Do I just need to buy a 5 >metre USB to USB cable please? If both of them already have a network adapter (which is common, typical for systems of this era) just put a crossover ethernet cable between the two systems. A bit more about networking configuration can be found on many websites with a Google search including terms like networking, file sharing. If the new system has a gigabit ethernet port instead of 100Mb, you can use a straight (standard) ethernet cable instead of a crossover cable. If you already have a router with integral switch or a standalone switch you don't need to connect the two directly together, can instead just connect them to that router or switch. If one of the systems doesn't have a network adapter it could still be cost effective to buy a network adapter and cable for that - it may cost no more than a more proprietary USB cable and having both able to be networked they are both more versatile in the long run. |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
No; wrong cable. You need to buy a Cat. 5 "Crossover Cable." It's a
special cable for doing just what you want to do. A normal Cat. 5 cable will NOT work. -- --DaveW "Terry Pinnell" <terrypinDELETE@THESEdial.pipex.com> wrote in message news:329at3paukljave4s6uo23ic789f66mgri@4ax.com... >I will need to transfer most of the data on my present ageing PC (XP > Home under SP1) to my new one (XP Pro, SP2). Do I just need to buy a 5 > metre USB to USB cable please? > > -- > Terry, East Grinstead, UK |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 15:49:02 -0700, "DaveW"
<radiation@nuclear.org> wrote: >No; wrong cable. You need to buy a Cat. 5 "Crossover Cable." It's a >special cable for doing just what you want to do. A normal Cat. 5 cable >will NOT work. .... assuming both systems have NICs. Also, a normal CAT5 cable WILL work if either of them (not necessarily both) have a gigabit network adapter, that is one of the features of gigabit over 100Mb. |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Terry Pinnell wrote: > I will need to transfer most of the data on my present ageing PC (XP > Home under SP1) to my new one (XP Pro, SP2). Do I just need to buy a 5 > metre USB to USB cable please? > > -- > Terry, East Grinstead, UK I just remembered LapLink. I used it a few years ago. Had a cable made up with a crossed over wire at one end. Did it run from com port to com port? I know there was something odd about it...apart from the fact that it was about 20metres long (I told my "lecky" mate that I needed a "bit of length"!!!) But it did work, & at that time, that alone was a great thing. How fast? No idea. |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
sandy58 wrote:
> > Terry Pinnell wrote: >> I will need to transfer most of the data on my present ageing PC (XP >> Home under SP1) to my new one (XP Pro, SP2). Do I just need to buy a 5 >> metre USB to USB cable please? >> >> -- >> Terry, East Grinstead, UK > I just remembered LapLink. I used it a few years ago. Had a cable made > up with a crossed over wire at one end. Did it run from com port to > com port? I know there was something odd about it...apart from the > fact that it was about 20metres long (I told my "lecky" mate that I > needed a "bit of length"!!!) But it did work, & at that time, that > alone was a great thing. > How fast? No idea. Check out a homemade program from me at location > http://home.planet.nl/~burry004/laplink.zip You need a cable between parallel printerports, wiring: connector1 connector2 2 15 3 13 4 12 5 10 6 11 10 5 11 6 12 4 13 3 15 2 18 18 19 19 20 20 21 21 22 22 23 23 24 24 25 25 2---6 cross over to 10---15, and 18--25 are ground wires, use them all to get some shielding inside the cable. Also if your cable has shielding, connect that to the plug case, so that both computer chassis are connected that way. I have used this on lots of computers and gigabytes, however its 6.3 short filenames only. Feel free to modify source code if you feel the need. Email me,if you need more info, demunge my address, figures are figures, the last part has doubled letters. |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
sandy58 wrote:
> > Terry Pinnell wrote: >> I will need to transfer most of the data on my present ageing PC (XP >> Home under SP1) to my new one (XP Pro, SP2). Do I just need to buy a 5 >> metre USB to USB cable please? >> >> -- >> Terry, East Grinstead, UK > I just remembered LapLink. I used it a few years ago. Had a cable made > up with a crossed over wire at one end. Did it run from com port to > com port? I know there was something odd about it...apart from the > fact that it was about 20metres long (I told my "lecky" mate that I > needed a "bit of length"!!!) But it did work, & at that time, that > alone was a great thing. > How fast? No idea. I forgot to mention: for pentium 200Mhz , transmission speed 50 Kbytes/s. That depends also on the cable length. I have used lengths up to 20 meters. |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"sandy58" <aleckie60@googlemail.com> wrote in message news:f68ee0c5-900e-43f2-b4c6-e2dfd735983b@h11g2000prf.googlegroups.com... > > > Terry Pinnell wrote: >> I will need to transfer most of the data on my present ageing PC (XP >> Home under SP1) to my new one (XP Pro, SP2). Do I just need to buy a 5 >> metre USB to USB cable please? >> >> -- >> Terry, East Grinstead, UK > I just remembered LapLink. I used it a few years ago. Had a cable made > up with a crossed over wire at one end. Did it run from com port to > com port? I know there was something odd about it...apart from the > fact that it was about 20metres long (I told my "lecky" mate that I > needed a "bit of length"!!!) But it did work, & at that time, that > alone was a great thing. > How fast? No idea. Many years ago LapLink was almost a standard for transfer between two local pcs, but that was before pcs were networked. (It was a lovely product back in those days ...) It was also in the days when serial and parallel ports were fast enough. Sjouke has already hinted at this, but even using the parallel port for data transfer will be very slow by modern standards. If the OP doesn't have LapLink and a suitable serial or parallel cable to hand then its not something I would source. A dedicated usb transfer cable or network would be much faster and both should be relatively cheap. -- Brian Cryer www.cryer.co.uk/brian |
|
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|

Main Page 

