PC Review
Forums
Newsgroups
Windows Vista
Windows Vista Mail
NOD32 messing up separation between different account in Windows Mail
Forums
Newsgroups
Windows Vista
Windows Vista Mail
NOD32 messing up separation between different account in Windows Mail
![]() |
NOD32 messing up separation between different account in Windows Mail |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
When I upgraded from NOD32 antivirus version 2.7 to version 3.0, I found
that the separation between different email accounts in Windows Mail was messed up. Problem: When I reply to a message received after the NOD32 upgrade, typically the account chosen by Windows Mail is the default account, not the account through which the message was received. Expected behavior: If I reply to a message received before the NOD32 upgrade, the account chosen by Windows Mail is the account through which the message was received. Version 3.0 processes messages in a different way than did version 2.7, creating a temporary folder within "Deleted items" after which a modified form of the message is put in the Inbox. It appears that something about this process messes up the association of a message with the account through which the message was received. The problem occurs more than 50% of the time but less than 100%. I've tested on two Vista computers and they both have the same problem. I have not figured out why the problem occurs on less than 100% of messages. I created two test messages on the same computer in the same format, differing only in that one added #2 to the subject line, and the problem occurred with the second message and not the first (though on another Vista machine, which received the same messages, the problem occurred for both messages, suggesting the problem is in processing a received message, not creating an original message). On 5 January I contacted the company using its Web support form and was told to expect a response after one business day. When I didn't get a response by 11 January I contacted them by phone and they agreed to bump the request to a higher level support person. The higher level support person responded "Please run this utility and let us know if this resolves the issue. http://www.softpedia.com/get/Tweak/Network-Tweak/WinSockFix.shtml". It was of no help, despite my responding to them the same day they did not respond. I phoned them again on 15 January and was told I was being put through to a special high priority line and when I left a message someone would respond the same day. I got no response. I've been happy with NOD32 except for this problem, though I've never tried to deal with their technical support before. Does anyone have any idea what is going wrong and how to fix it? Technical details: NOD32 3.0.621.0 with all signature updates. Windows Vista (one Business, one Home) with all updates. |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"Mickey Segal" <not_monitored@example.com> wrote in message
news:u%23inE7GWIHA.5984@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... > When I upgraded from NOD32 antivirus version 2.7 to version 3.0, I found > that the separation between different email accounts in Windows Mail was > messed up. > > Problem: When I reply to a message received after the NOD32 upgrade, > typically the account chosen by Windows Mail is the default account, not > the account through which the message was received. > > Expected behavior: If I reply to a message received before the NOD32 > upgrade, the account chosen by Windows Mail is the account through which > the message was received. > > Version 3.0 processes messages in a different way than did version 2.7, > creating a temporary folder within "Deleted items" after which a modified > form of the message is put in the Inbox. It appears that something about > this process messes up the association of a message with the account > through which the message was received. > > The problem occurs more than 50% of the time but less than 100%. I've > tested on two Vista computers and they both have the same problem. I have > not figured out why the problem occurs on less than 100% of messages. I > created two test messages on the same computer in the same format, > differing only in that one added #2 to the subject line, and the problem > occurred with the second message and not the first (though on another > Vista machine, which received the same messages, the problem occurred for > both messages, suggesting the problem is in processing a received message, > not creating an original message). > > On 5 January I contacted the company using its Web support form and was > told to expect a response after one business day. When I didn't get a > response by 11 January I contacted them by phone and they agreed to bump > the request to a higher level support person. The higher level support > person responded "Please run this utility and let us know if this resolves > the issue. > http://www.softpedia.com/get/Tweak/Network-Tweak/WinSockFix.shtml". It was > of no help, despite my responding to them the same day they did not > respond. I phoned them again on 15 January and was told I was being put > through to a special high priority line and when I left a message someone > would respond the same day. I got no response. > > I've been happy with NOD32 except for this problem, though I've never > tried to deal with their technical support before. > > Does anyone have any idea what is going wrong and how to fix it? > > Technical details: > NOD32 3.0.621.0 with all signature updates. > Windows Vista (one Business, one Home) with all updates. > Email scanning should be turned off in any anti-virus. Also exclude EML files from the scan. It provides no protection not provided by the regular resident protection. Sooner or later email scanning almost always causes problems and it provides no benefit. -- Frank Saunders MS-MVP IE,OE/WM www.fjsmjs.com Do not reply with email |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Should I just tell the NOD32 folks that email scanning is a waste of time
and that they shouldn't bother fixing their product, they should just delete the feature? Don't many people buy an antivirus program precisely to protect against threats in email? "Frank Saunders MS-MVP IE,OE/WM" <franksaunders@mvps.org> wrote in message news:9FF754E9-FA2A-4957-8B0C-9F1D0DC05834@microsoft.com... > Email scanning should be turned off in any anti-virus. Also exclude EML > files from the scan. It provides no > protection not provided by the regular resident protection. > Sooner or later email scanning almost always causes problems and it > provides no benefit. |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Email scanning is a redundant (unnecessary) feature
since all files including emails, are already protected by the AV's real-time scanner. Even Symantec (Norton) admits this in writing on their website. -- Gary VanderMolen, MS-MVP (WLMail) "Mickey Segal" <not_monitored@example.com> wrote in message news:ORJoXALWIHA.5208@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... > Should I just tell the NOD32 folks that email scanning is a waste of time and that they shouldn't bother fixing their product, > they should just delete the feature? Don't many people buy an antivirus program precisely to protect against threats in email? > > "Frank Saunders MS-MVP IE,OE/WM" <franksaunders@mvps.org> wrote in message > news:9FF754E9-FA2A-4957-8B0C-9F1D0DC05834@microsoft.com... >> Email scanning should be turned off in any anti-virus. Also exclude EML files from the scan. It provides no >> protection not provided by the regular resident protection. >> Sooner or later email scanning almost always causes problems and it provides no benefit. > |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I wonder if this has anything to do with the reason that the NOD32 folks
continue not to respond to this query (though I've never dealt with their support system before and can't exclude the possibility that other support requests also go weeks without response despite the company touting its "next business day" response time). "Gary VanderMolen" <gary@NoMail.invalid> wrote in message news:er$w6aLWIHA.5160@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... > Email scanning is a redundant (unnecessary) feature > since all files including emails, are already protected > by the AV's real-time scanner. Even Symantec (Norton) > admits this in writing on their website. |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I called up the NOD32 company again. After mentioning this thread and how
high it comes up in a Google search (http://www.google.com/search?q=nod32+%22windows+mail%22) they put me through to a support person. Soon after I got an email suggesting: "What we would like you to do is open ESET and click the F5 key to access the setup screen. From there, scroll down to the bottom and choose Email client integration and uncheck the two boxes labled Integrate into Microsoft Outlook and Integrate int Outlook Express/ Windows Mail and then scroll up to POP3 and go to the Compatibility subfolder and move the compatiblity level over to maximum compatibility to see if this does not correct the issue you are having." Unfortunately this didn't fix the problem. I replied to the email, as so instructed. It will be interesting if they suggest turning off email checking even more thoroughly or decide to reproduce the problem themselves and fix it. Or maybe, as in the past, the won't respond at all unless I call. "Mickey Segal" <not_monitored@example.com> wrote in message news:u8CwHYRWIHA.4896@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... >I wonder if this has anything to do with the reason that the NOD32 folks >continue not to respond to this query (though I've never dealt with their >support system before and can't exclude the possibility that other support >requests also go weeks without response despite the company touting its >"next business day" response time). |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I did hear back from the NOD32 folks, but they said "we just uploaded to the
downloads page a newer version" and suggested trying that, but both the version they cite and the one on their Web site are the same one I installed on 26 December, as documented in my initial support request on 5 January. They also wrote "Next we will collect some logs from you as we would really like to know what is going on" but didn't say which logs to send. They suggested the possibility of uninstalling their software, but since I can reproduce the problem on two different computers by replying to emails received after the upgrade from 2.7 to 3.0 (but not before) it is not clear that such an approach is likely to do much other than waste time. I asked twice if they've ever tried to check this on one of their own computers but they gave no reply at all to that question. "Mickey Segal" <not_monitored@example.com> wrote in message news:uqul2kTWIHA.1208@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... >I called up the NOD32 company again. After mentioning this thread and how >high it comes up in a Google search >(http://www.google.com/search?q=nod32+%22windows+mail%22) they put me >through to a support person. > > Soon after I got an email suggesting: "What we would like you to do is > open ESET and click the F5 key to access the setup screen. From there, > scroll down to the bottom and choose Email client integration and uncheck > the two boxes labled Integrate into Microsoft Outlook and Integrate int > Outlook Express/ Windows Mail and then scroll up to POP3 and go to the > Compatibility subfolder and move the compatiblity level over to maximum > compatibility to see if this does not correct the issue you are having." > > Unfortunately this didn't fix the problem. I replied to the email, as so > instructed. It will be interesting if they suggest turning off email > checking even more thoroughly or decide to reproduce the problem > themselves and fix it. Or maybe, as in the past, the won't respond at all > unless I call. |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Thanks for keeping us informed.
-- Gary VanderMolen, MS-MVP (WLMail) "Mickey Segal" <not_monitored@example.com> wrote in message news:#GHEjefWIHA.4880@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... > I did hear back from the NOD32 folks, but they said "we just uploaded to the downloads page a newer version" and suggested > trying that, but both the version they cite and the one on their Web site are the same one I installed on 26 December, as > documented in my initial support request on 5 January. They also wrote "Next we will collect some logs from you as we would > really like to know what is going on" but didn't say which logs to send. They suggested the possibility of uninstalling their > software, but since I can reproduce the problem on two different computers by replying to emails received after the upgrade from > 2.7 to 3.0 (but not before) it is not clear that such an approach is likely to do much other than waste time. > > I asked twice if they've ever tried to check this on one of their own computers but they gave no reply at all to that question. > > > "Mickey Segal" <not_monitored@example.com> wrote in message news:uqul2kTWIHA.1208@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... >>I called up the NOD32 company again. After mentioning this thread and how high it comes up in a Google search >>(http://www.google.com/search?q=nod32+%22windows+mail%22) they put me through to a support person. >> >> Soon after I got an email suggesting: "What we would like you to do is open ESET and click the F5 key to access the setup >> screen. From there, scroll down to the bottom and choose Email client integration and uncheck the two boxes labled Integrate >> into Microsoft Outlook and Integrate int Outlook Express/ Windows Mail and then scroll up to POP3 and go to the Compatibility >> subfolder and move the compatiblity level over to maximum compatibility to see if this does not correct the issue you are >> having." >> >> Unfortunately this didn't fix the problem. I replied to the email, as so instructed. It will be interesting if they suggest >> turning off email checking even more thoroughly or decide to reproduce the problem themselves and fix it. Or maybe, as in the >> past, the won't respond at all unless I call. > |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I heard back from the NOD32 folks again today. They asked for me to run the
following two reporting programs and send them the output: http://nod32-av.com/utilities/HiJac.../hijackthis.exe http://www.lookinmypc.com Twice I've asked "Have you set up multiple accounts on Windows Mail and tested this yourselves" and gotten no reply. When I sent the two log files that they requested today I asked a third time. I wonder whether they are trapped in a support mindset that doesn't allow them to try to reproduce a problem without asking for all sorts of log files and reinstallations. "Gary VanderMolen" <gary@NoMail.invalid> wrote in message news:exBjEWkWIHA.1376@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... > Thanks for keeping us informed. |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
They are just having you do a bunch of 'busy work', so it looks like they
are actually doing something, when they are probably hoping you'll get tired of playing and you'll just give up and go away. -- Gary VanderMolen, MS-MVP (WLMail) "Mickey Segal" <not_monitored@example.com> wrote in message news:uw27bZVXIHA.1184@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... > I heard back from the NOD32 folks again today. They asked for me to run the following two reporting programs and send them the > output: > http://nod32-av.com/utilities/HiJac.../hijackthis.exe > http://www.lookinmypc.com > > Twice I've asked "Have you set up multiple accounts on Windows Mail and tested this yourselves" and gotten no reply. When I > sent the two log files that they requested today I asked a third time. I wonder whether they are trapped in a support mindset > that doesn't allow them to try to reproduce a problem without asking for all sorts of log files and reinstallations. > > "Gary VanderMolen" <gary@NoMail.invalid> wrote in message news:exBjEWkWIHA.1376@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... >> Thanks for keeping us informed. > |
|
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|

Main Page 

